On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:35:27AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Am 28.05.2013 23:16, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> Dear Tom,
> >>
> >> In message <20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >>>
> Of course thi
Hello Tom,
Am 28.05.2013 23:16, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> In message <20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
current API in U-
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
> > > current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be
>
Dear Tom,
In message <20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
> > current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be applied
> > to
> > program raw memory partitions, including UBI images.
>
>
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote:
[snip]
> Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
> current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be applied to
> program raw memory partitions, including UBI images.
Correct.
Hi
On May 28, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:43:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Benoît
>>
>> On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantel
Hi Pantelis,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:43:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Benoît
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>
> > Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 P
Hi Benoît
On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
D
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> Dear Tom,
> >>
> >> In message <20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat> you wro
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:24:06AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> > Dear Heiko,
> >
> > In message <51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de> you wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
> >>> we d
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko,
>
> In message <51a427a8.8090...@denx.de> you wrote:
> >
> > > Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
> >
> > You find this in drivers/dfu/dfu.c:
> >
> > static unsigned char __aligned(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_S
Hi Tom,
On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> In message <20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
>>>
>>> In buffering the data. We ca
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
> >
> > In buffering the data. We cannot write a chunk of a file to a
> > filesystem and then a
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Heiko,
>
> In message <51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>
>>> I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
>>> we do UBI as ubi ubiN volume-name, ie:
>>> rootfs ubi ubi0 rootfs
>>> user ubi ubi0 u
Dear Heiko,
In message <51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
> > we do UBI as ubi ubiN volume-name, ie:
> > rootfs ubi ubi0 rootfs
> > user ubi ubi0 user-data
> > and so forth, and augment dfu_nand.c with UBI knowledge
Dear Heiko,
In message <51a427a8.8090...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
>
> You find this in drivers/dfu/dfu.c:
>
> static unsigned char __aligned(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
>dfu_buf[DFU_DATA_BUF_SIZE];
Ah, so it
Dear Tom,
In message <20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
>
> In buffering the data. We cannot write a chunk of a file to a
> filesystem and then append to it, we don't have the API today.
Sorry, I still don't get it. Assumin
Hello Tom,
Am 27.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>>>
>>> In message <51a30f34.7030...@denx.de> you wrote:
[...]
>> I pretty much agree. UB
Hello Tom,
Am 27.05.2013 21:21, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:09:22AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> Ah, looking in drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c, they use dfu->layout
>> for switching between DFU_RAW_ADDR, DFU_FS_FAT, DFU_FS_EXT4...
>>
>> After all ... should we add a DFU_UB
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 27.05.2013 23:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
>> NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
>> larger t
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:25:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
> > NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
> >
Dear Tom,
In message <20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
> NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
> larger than RAM. But for filesystems we don't support that notion in
> genera
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > Dear Heiko Schocher,
> >
> > In message <51a30f34.7030...@denx.de> you wrote:
> >>
> >> But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
> >> nand
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:09:22AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
[snip]
> Ah, looking in drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c, they use dfu->layout
> for switching between DFU_RAW_ADDR, DFU_FS_FAT, DFU_FS_EXT4...
>
> After all ... should we add a DFU_UBI and add this to
> drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c?
Yes, I think we
Hi
On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> In message <51a30f34.7030...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>
>> But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
>> nand?
>>
>> If ubi is a new dfu interface, somebody must start dfu on u-boot
>> with "dfu
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <51a30f34.7030...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
> nand?
>
> If ubi is a new dfu interface, somebody must start dfu on u-boot
> with "dfu nand .." or "dfu ubi .." dependent on which partition
> has to be u
Hello,
Am 27.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Pantelis Antoniou:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> Hello Lukasz,
>>
>> Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Fri, May 24
Hi Guys,
On May 27, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Lukasz,
>
> Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>>> Hello Tom,
>>>
>>> Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
Hello Lukasz,
Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> Hi Heiko,
>
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Heiko,
> Hello Tom,
>
> Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi Heiko,
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
>>> based on an AM3
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
In message <6ad958cb-3cfc-4362-b72d-511147d04...@antoniou-consulting.com> you
wrote:
>
> > How To do this? Current state on this board is to erase the rootfs
> > mtd partition with a nand erase and write the new image using
> > dfu_nand.c ... which calls in the end nand_w
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
> > based on an AM335x. This board support uses for example a rootfs in
>
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
> based on an AM335x. This board support uses for example a rootfs in
> an UBI Volume on a NAND flash, and this should be updated with dfu ...
>
> How To
34 matches
Mail list logo