Hello Wolfgang, Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Heiko, > > In message <51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de> you wrote: >> >>> I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way, >>> we do UBI as <name> ubi ubiN volume-name, ie: >>> rootfs ubi ubi0 rootfs >>> user ubi ubi0 user-data >>> and so forth, and augment dfu_nand.c with UBI knowledge, ala dfu_mmc and >>> fat/ext knowledge. >> >> Yes, I think, thats the way to go ... > > I doubt that dfu_nand.c is the right place for this. What if I start > using DFU on NOR flash? The decisions which device type (NAND, MMC, > NOR, USB mass storage, ...) to habdle on one side, and which partition > type / image type (raw, UBI volume, file, ...) on the other side are > fully orthogonal to each other. They should be handled by independent > code, and not one of them repeated for all implementations of the > other.
Yes, exactly ... bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
