On 08/16/2011 06:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> How about a patch that was sent, that at the time didn't depend on
>>> another series, but after review and changes, now depends on those
>>> changes?
>> Then you have to note it in the version history that it now depends on
>> another patch - don't fo
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/16/2011 02:06 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>> Even a bit more generally, some of the series are getting quite long
>>> due to small dependencies. This tends to put lots of unrelated
>>> cont
On 08/16/2011 02:06 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> Hi u-boot,
>>
>> What is the recommended way to handle a patch series that depends on
>> another patch series (already sent but not integrated)?
>>
> AFAIK the recommend way is to note in t
Hi Joe,
On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi u-boot,
>
> What is the recommended way to handle a patch series that depends on
> another patch series (already sent but not integrated)?
>
AFAIK the recommend way is to note in the patch that it depends on
another - best with some kind
Hello Tom,
>>> In message <4bb45f3d.8040...@st.com> you wrote:
After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
continuously sent and reviewed.
Is it correct to assume that a patch
Vipin KUMAR wrote:
> On 4/1/2010 2:45 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Vipin KUMAR,
>>
>> In message <4bb45f3d.8040...@st.com> you wrote:
>>> After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
>>> can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
>>> continuo
On 4/1/2010 2:45 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Vipin KUMAR,
>
> In message <4bb45f3d.8040...@st.com> you wrote:
>>
>> After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
>> can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
>> continuously sent and reviewed.
Dear Vipin KUMAR,
In message <4bb45f3d.8040...@st.com> you wrote:
>
> After reading about the patch submission process, I felt that patches
> can only be sent when the merging window is open but patches are being
> continuously sent and reviewed.
>
> Is it correct to assume that a patch can be s
8 matches
Mail list logo
