Re: [U-Boot] AT91 working SD with u-boot

2010-05-26 Thread Kalyan
Sebastian Heutling who-ing.de> writes: > > Hi Konrad, > > are you using the AT91SAM9G20-EK? > > In that case the difference between us is that I'm working on a > different board which is using the slotb MCI while the AT91SAM9G20-EK > uses slota. > > In case of slota it just worked because M

Re: [U-Boot] AT91 working SD with u-boot

2009-10-04 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:28 +0200, Sebastian Heutling wrote : > Hi Konrad, > On 10/01/2009 10:33 AM, Konrad Mattheis wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > yes I'm using an AT91SAM9G20-EK Rev.c with two SD slots. > > I used slot a but I think you just have to init slot b. > > in PatchV3 you can read: > >>

Re: [U-Boot] AT91 working SD with u-boot

2009-10-01 Thread Sebastian Heutling
Hi Konrad, On 10/01/2009 10:33 AM, Konrad Mattheis wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > yes I'm using an AT91SAM9G20-EK Rev.c with two SD slots. > I used slot a but I think you just have to init slot b. > > in PatchV3 you can read: > >> at91_mci0_hw_init(int slot, int bus_width) > >> switch (slot) { >>

Re: [U-Boot] AT91 working SD with u-boot

2009-10-01 Thread Konrad Mattheis
Hi Sebastian, yes I'm using an AT91SAM9G20-EK Rev.c with two SD slots. I used slot a but I think you just have to init slot b. in PatchV3 you can read: >at91_mci0_hw_init(int slot, int bus_width) >switch (slot) { > case 0: > . > case 1: So I

Re: [U-Boot] AT91 working SD with u-boot

2009-10-01 Thread Sebastian Heutling
Hi Konrad, are you using the AT91SAM9G20-EK? In that case the difference between us is that I'm working on a different board which is using the slotb MCI while the AT91SAM9G20-EK uses slota. In case of slota it just worked because MCI_SDCR is 0 on reset but for slotb the SDCSEL field must be