Hi Masahiro,
> > Regarding the patch itself, why a shell script rather than a variant
> > of cc-option?
>
> I chose a shell script because I wanted to keep Makefile cleaner
> and this is the way Linux Kernel often uses.
>
> Please refer to
> - scripts/gcc-goto.sh
> - scripts/gcc-version.sh
> e
Hello Albert
> Much better than the previous one (with a nitpick: superfluous "s" in
> "This commits")... But now we lack the rationale part, which was
> dropped rather than moved after the '---' line.
I will add the rationale part in v4 along with s/commits/commit/.
Thanks.
> Regarding the p
Hi Masahiro,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:11:26 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> If -fstack-usage option is given for such architecures
> that do not support it, gcc displays a warning message
> but still exits with status 0.
>
> This commits adds a new scripts to test -fstack-usage support
> because
3 matches
Mail list logo
