Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Would it suffice to change the patch description for this patch to be
> accepted, or do you still want this patch to be dropped / changes? We
> could use fdcur, fdtrg, devcur, devtrg, erasecur, erasetrg to save the
> typ
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > It's not purely stylistic. For example, previously the code had fd and
> > fdr, curdev and otherdev. It used one erase struct for both main and
> > redundant copies, th
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> It's not purely stylistic. For example, previously the code had fd and
> fdr, curdev and otherdev. It used one erase struct for both main and
> redundant copies, thus they had to initialise it multiple times to one or
>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Use consistent naming for active and redundant environment variables, remove
> > redundant erase struct initialisation by using separate structs for the
> > active and redunda
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Use consistent naming for active and redundant environment variables, remove
> redundant erase struct initialisation by using separate structs for the
> active and redundant environments.
This is another sylistic change that
5 matches
Mail list logo
