On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 04:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[snip]
>> board/ti/beagle/config.mk | 33 ---
[snip]
> config.mk removal does not belong to that patch...
> It should be a separate one, say cleanup patch.
I can do this in its own pa
On 10/28/2011 09:42 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> OK, so, Scott, where would
On 10/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> OK, so, Scott, where would you suggest we put a very trivial set of nand
>>
On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
OK, so, Scott, where would you suggest we put a very trivial set of nand
infrastructure we need outside of the scope
On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> OK, so, Scott, where would you suggest we put a very trivial set of nand
>>> infrastructure we need outside of the scope of loading u-boot itself
>>> from NAND ?
>>
>>
On 10/28/2011 01:19 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 06:02 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 11:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>>>
>>> In message <4ea9ca9d.6010...@compulab.co.il> you wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> This introduces 200MHz
On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 04:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> [snip]
>> +/* nand_c
On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 04:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> [snip]
> +/* nand_command: Send a flash command to the flash chip */
On 10/27/2011 06:02 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 11:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>>
>> In message <4ea9ca9d.6010...@compulab.co.il> you wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
On 10/27/2011 04:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[snip]
+/* nand_command: Send a flash command to the flash chip */
+static void nand_command(unsigned char com
On 10/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
>>> and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping. The memory init logic
>>> is also base
On 10/27/2011 11:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Igor Grinberg,
>
> In message <4ea9ca9d.6010...@compulab.co.il> you wrote:
>> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
>>> and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping.
On 10/27/2011 02:18 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
>> and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping. The memory init logic
>> is also based on what x-loader does in these cases. Note
Dear Igor Grinberg,
In message <4ea9ca9d.6010...@compulab.co.il> you wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
> > and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping. The memory init logic
> > is also based on what x
On 10/26/2011 11:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
> and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping. The memory init logic
> is also based on what x-loader does in these cases. Note that while
> previously u-boot would be flashed in
On 10/27/2011 05:46 AM, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
>> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Rini, Tom
>> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:44 AM
>> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: Add SPL
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Rini, Tom
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:44 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: Add SPL support to Beagleboard
>
> This introduces 200MHz M
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> This introduces 200MHz Micron parts timing information based on x-loader
> and re-organizes the file slightly for grouping. The memory init logic
> is also based on what x-loader does in these cases. Note that while
> previously u-boot would be
19 matches
Mail list logo
