On 10/28/2011 09:42 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>>> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>> OK, so, Scott, where would you suggest we put a very trivial set of nand
>>>>>> infrastructure we need outside of the scope of loading u-boot itself
>>>>>> from NAND ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can the SPL code be used (not an actual SPL build, just the NAND code
>>>>> associated with it)?
>>>>
>>>> As-is, no, it'll fail to compile unless you fill in a number of blanks
>>>> about ECC and so forth.
>>>
>>> "...with appropriate refactoring" was implied. :-)
>>>
>>>> If we split nand_spl_simple.c in two, we might
>>>> be able to re-use nand_command there (maybe with some re-thinking of the
>>>> #if logic for big or small pages). Give me filenames and I'll do the
>>>> work :)
>>>
>>> Pick whatever name you think makes sense given what's going to be in it.
>>
>> nand_spl_{cmd,read}.c ? _cmd gets the two nand_command() funcs, _read
>> gets everything else. Work for you?
>
> Could you stick a "simple" in there somewhere?
>
> Maybe nand_spl_simple.c and nand_cmd_simple.c (or nand_spl_simple_cmd.c
> if you want to keep the reference to spl as its primary purpose)?
nand_spl_simple.c + nand_spl_simple_cmd.c it is then, thanks. Putting
this on my v2012.03 TODO list (which is when I figure I should have this
all done and a merge window be available).
--
Tom
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
