Hi Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
>
>> as I told in another mail, the min I/O size adaption patch leads to
>> incompatibilites for the UBIFS and therefore the similar patch in linux
>> kernel was reverted. But anyway the first five patches in the patch serie
>> are already part of the mtd layer of t
Hi Holger & Detlev,
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 09:26:56 Holger Brunck wrote:
> > do you have any comment on this series? I delegated the patches to you
> > in patchwork already :) No seriously, the patches look sane and are in
> > accordance to what is done in Linux
I'm back from vacation
Hi Detlev,
Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> do you have any comment on this series? I delegated the patches to you
> in patchwork already :) No seriously, the patches look sane and are in
> accordance to what is done in Linux
>
>> This field will be used to indicate the write buffer s
Hi Stefan,
do you have any comment on this series? I delegated the patches to you
in patchwork already :) No seriously, the patches look sane and are in
accordance to what is done in Linux
> This field will be used to indicate the write buffer size
> of the MTD device. UBI will set it's min
4 matches
Mail list logo
