> >>> with this patch, this mpc8313 board does this:
> >>>
> >>> U-Boot 2009.06-00524-g28958b8 (Jul 23 2009 - 18:33:11) MPC83XX
> >>>
> >>> Reset Status:
> >>>
> >>> CPU: e300c3, MPC8313E, Rev: 1.0 at 333.333 MHz, CSB: 166.667 MHz
> >>> Board: Freescale MPC8313ERDB
> >>> I2C: ready
> >>> DRAM:
Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
>>> with this patch, this mpc8313 board does this:
>>>
>>> U-Boot 2009.06-00524-g28958b8 (Jul 23 2009 - 18:33:11) MPC83XX
>>>
>>> Reset Status:
>>>
>>> CPU: e300c3, MPC8313E, Rev: 1.0 at 333.333 MHz, CSB: 166.667 MHz
>>> Board: Freescale MPC8313ERDB
>>> I2C: ready
>>> DRA
> > with this patch, this mpc8313 board does this:
> >
> > U-Boot 2009.06-00524-g28958b8 (Jul 23 2009 - 18:33:11) MPC83XX
> >
> > Reset Status:
> >
> > CPU: e300c3, MPC8313E, Rev: 1.0 at 333.333 MHz, CSB: 166.667 MHz
> > Board: Freescale MPC8313ERDB
> > I2C: ready
> > DRAM: 128 MB
> > FLASH
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40:09AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> with this patch, this mpc8313 board does this:
>
> U-Boot 2009.06-00524-g28958b8 (Jul 23 2009 - 18:33:11) MPC83XX
>
> Reset Status:
>
> CPU: e300c3, MPC8313E, Rev: 1.0 at 333.333 MHz, CSB: 166.667 MHz
> Board: Freescale MPC8313ERD
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> In message <20090723190101.c8f8a832e...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
>>
>> In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com>
>> you wrote:
>>> Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data cache
>>>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:41:21AM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:46 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Peter,
> >
> > In message <20090723190101.c8f8a832e...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you
> > > w
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:46:16 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> In message <20090723190101.c8f8a832e...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
> >
> > In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote:
> > > Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data cache
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:46 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> In message <20090723190101.c8f8a832e...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
> >
> > In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote:
> > > Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data cache wh
Dear Peter,
In message <20090723190101.c8f8a832e...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
>
> In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote:
> > Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data cache which
> > was used as early RAM when booting to Linux using the "bootm
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:01:01 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> FLASH: ## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0x0200 = 0 MB
> 32 MB
> PCI: Bus Dev VenId DevId Class Int
> 00 0b 104c ac55 0607 ff
> 00 0b 104c ac55 0607 ff
> => fli
>
>
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message <1247269570-11406-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote:
> Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data cache which
> was used as early RAM when booting to Linux using the "bootm" command.
> This change causes all PPC boards with CONFIG_SYS_INIT
On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
I've tested this on 86xx boards, it'd be great if someone
could test on
83xx and 74xx/7xx. 85xx boards should not be affected by
>> this change.
This change assumes
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u
> > > I've tested this on 86xx boards, it'd be great if someone
> > > could test on
> > > 83xx and 74xx/7xx. 85xx boards should not be affected by
> this change.
> > >
> > > This change assumes
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/63423
> > > has already been applied, o
Dear "Liu Dave-R63238",
In message
you wrote:
> > Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data
> > cache which
> > was used as early RAM when booting to Linux using the "bootm" command.
> > This change causes all PPC boards with
> > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK defined
> > to unlock
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 07:52 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
> > Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data
> > cache which
> > was used as early RAM when booting to Linux using the "bootm" command.
> > This change causes all PPC boards with
> > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK defined
> >
> Previously, non-e500 architectures only unlocked their data
> cache which
> was used as early RAM when booting to Linux using the "bootm" command.
> This change causes all PPC boards with
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK defined
> to unlock their data cache during U-Boot's initialization. This
> imp
16 matches
Mail list logo