On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote: >>>> I've tested this on 86xx boards, it'd be great if someone >>>> could test on >>>> 83xx and 74xx/7xx. 85xx boards should not be affected by >> this change. >>>> >>>> This change assumes >>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/63423 >>>> has already been applied, or the lib/ppc patches in the diffs >>>> below can >>>> be changed to lib_ppc. >>> >>> I'm afraid some 83xx boards will not work after the patch >> is applied. >>> It is some was assuming the data cache locked. (that is >> cache-inhibited) >> >> Are you just concerned, or did you actually test the patch, with >> negative results? > > I'm just concerned. I didn't test the patch.
I still don't understand the concern. I think we should go ahead with this patch and if it really shows an issue we can revert it. However, I'm really dont know under what situation that a board has defined CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK that unlock_ram_in_cache() once we are running in RAM should be an issue. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
