On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi ub...@lukaperkov.net,
>
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:15:52 +0200, ub...@lukaperkov.net wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom, Albert, Prafulla and others,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
>> > IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has tw
Hi ub...@lukaperkov.net,
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:15:52 +0200, ub...@lukaperkov.net wrote:
> Hi Tom, Albert, Prafulla and others,
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> > IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
> > bus even when the secon
Hi Tom, Albert, Prafulla and others,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
> bus even when the second one should be probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz
> Tested-by: Luka Perkov
> ---
>
> Simon
Hi,
It works great for my IB-6220 (Dual Sata).
Without the patch, the same disk is seen twice, I have only checked
disks serial numbers :
ib62x0 => version
U-Boot 2012.07-00123-g4d3c95f-dirty (Aug 13 2012 - 11:30:58) RaidSonic
ICY BOX IB-NAS62x0
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5
GNU
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:27:16 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:36:33 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> >
> > In message
> >
> > you wrote:
> > > Sorry Luka (and all), been tied up pretty heavily recently, had to
> > > adjust to find som
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:36:33 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message
>
> you wrote:
> > Sorry Luka (and all), been tied up pretty heavily recently, had to
> > adjust to find some free time again.
> >
> > I will test your patch today and post results tonig
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message
you wrote:
> Sorry Luka (and all), been tied up pretty heavily recently, had to
> adjust to find some free time again.
>
> I will test your patch today and post results tonight.
What was the outcome of this? I cannot find any further messages to
this thread...
Sorry Luka (and all), been tied up pretty heavily recently, had to
adjust to find some free time again.
I will test your patch today and post results tonight.
2012/6/7 Luka Perkov
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > >On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:1
Hi Albert,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:19:41PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:38:19AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>>Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays
> >>>on Marvell n
Hi Rogan,
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:23:15PM +0200, Rogan Dawes wrote:
> I had something similar for my DNS323 port (orion5x-based), which
> other people may be remembering.
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075589.html
>
> I seem to recall Wolfgang was not terribly enthused
Hi Tibor,
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 05:03:13PM +0200, Vágó Tibor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tested this IDE patch on my NAS6220 and it works.
>
> U-boot detect both HDD correctly and boot from them.
Thank you for testing.
Regards,
Luka
___
U-Boot mailing li
On 19/04/2012 08:38, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Dave,
Le 18/04/2012 23:37, David Purdy a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
bus even when the second one should be probed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz
Hi,
I've tested this IDE patch on my NAS6220 and it works.
U-boot detect both HDD correctly and boot from them.
Cheers,
Tibor
Original message
IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
bus even when the second one should be probed.
Signed-off-
Hi,
I've tested this IDE patch on my NAS6220 and it works.
U-boot detect both HDD correctly and boot from them.
Cheers,
Tibor
Original message
IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
bus even when the second one should be probed.
Signed-off-
Hi Albert,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >diff --git a/include/ide.h b/include/ide.h
> >index 8ecc9dd..385e909 100644
> >--- a/include/ide.h
> >+++ b/include/ide.h
> >@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> > #ifndef_IDE_H
> > #define _IDE_H
> >
> >-#define IDE_BUS(dev)
Hi Luka,
Le 14/05/2012 21:29, Luka Perkov a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:19:41PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:38:19AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays
on Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:19:41PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:38:19AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays
> > on Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e.g., orion5x).
> >
> > ISTR it is not the firs
Hi Albert,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:38:19AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays
> on Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e.g., orion5x).
>
> ISTR it is not the first time we deal with the whole IDE number of
> bus / number of ports [ /
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
>
> Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays on
> Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e.g., orion5x).
>
> ISTR it is not the first time we deal with the whole IDE number of bus /
> number of ports [ / u
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Luka Perkov
> Sent: 18 April 2012 00:37
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix IDE_BUS(dev) macro
>
> IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus
Hi Dave,
Le 18/04/2012 23:37, David Purdy a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
bus even when the second one should be probed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz
Tested-by: Luka Perkov
---
Simon discover
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
> IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
> bus even when the second one should be probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz
> Tested-by: Luka Perkov
> ---
>
> Simon discovered this while adding support for new boa
22 matches
Mail list logo