Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:26:15AM +, manikanda...@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Eugen and Sumit, > > On 28/02/25 5:07 pm, Sumit Garg wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 16:45, Eugen Hristev >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

Hi Eugen and Sumit, On 28/02/25 5:07 pm, Sumit Garg wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 16:45, Eugen Hristev wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/28/25 12:58, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:20, wro

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On 2/28/25 12:58, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:20, wrote: >> >> Hi Eugen, >> >> On 27/02/25 7:48 pm, Eugen Hristev wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the >>> content is safe >>> >>> On 2/27/25 12:37, manikanda...@microchip.com wro

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 16:45, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > > > On 2/28/25 12:58, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:20, wrote: > >> > >> Hi Eugen, > >> > >> On 27/02/25 7:48 pm, Eugen Hristev wrote: > >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know > >>> the c

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 13:46, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > Hei hei, > > Am Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:05:52PM +0530 schrieb Manikandan Muralidharan: > > Add PMC clock definitions for MCK and UTMI which will be required > > for the sam9x7 OF_upstream DT since the clock framework is not in > > sync with L

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:20, wrote: > > Hi Eugen, > > On 27/02/25 7:48 pm, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > On 2/27/25 12:37, manikanda...@microchip.com wrote: > >> Hi Sumit, > >> > >> On 27/02/25 3:14

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

Hi Eugen, On 27/02/25 7:48 pm, Eugen Hristev wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > On 2/27/25 12:37, manikanda...@microchip.com wrote: >> Hi Sumit, >> >> On 27/02/25 3:14 pm, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click li

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

Hei hei, Am Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:05:52PM +0530 schrieb Manikandan Muralidharan: > Add PMC clock definitions for MCK and UTMI which will be required > for the sam9x7 OF_upstream DT since the clock framework is not in > sync with Linux and also include this header in 'clock/at91.h' file > > Sign

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On 2/27/25 12:37, manikanda...@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > On 27/02/25 3:14 pm, Sumit Garg wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the >> content is safe >> >> On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 15:06, Manikandan Muralidharan >> wrote: >>> >>> Add PMC clo

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

Hi Sumit, On 27/02/25 3:14 pm, Sumit Garg wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 15:06, Manikandan Muralidharan > wrote: >> >> Add PMC clock definitions for MCK and UTMI which will be required >> for the s

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: clk: define additional PMC clocks

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 15:06, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote: > > Add PMC clock definitions for MCK and UTMI which will be required > for the sam9x7 OF_upstream DT since the clock framework is not in > sync with Linux and also include this header in 'clock/at91.h' file You should rather drop these