Re: [PATCH 01/18] bootm: netbds: Drop passing of arguments

2023-12-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:53:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > I am replying to this email since it still has the context below. > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 03:48, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > From: Simon Glass > > > Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:26:17 -0700 > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > There

Re: [PATCH 01/18] bootm: netbds: Drop passing of arguments

2023-12-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, I am replying to this email since it still has the context below. On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 03:48, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > From: Simon Glass > > Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:26:17 -0700 > > Hi Simon, > > There is a typo in first line of the commit message: s/netbds/netbsd/. > > > It isn't clear

Re: [PATCH 01/18] bootm: netbds: Drop passing of arguments

2023-12-04 Thread Martin Husemann
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:48:17AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > That said, I'm not sure to what extent the bootm command is used to > boot NetBSD these days. So this may not really matter. It is used on most 32bit ARM platforms. Martin

Re: [PATCH 01/18] bootm: netbds: Drop passing of arguments

2023-12-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Simon Glass > Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:26:17 -0700 Hi Simon, There is a typo in first line of the commit message: s/netbds/netbsd/. > It isn't clear how useful it is to pass the arguments of bootm to the > OS. For example, if "bootm 1000 2000 3000" is used, the three arguments > at the