Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2020-04-21 Thread Angus Ainslie
On 2019-12-11 18:14, Fabio Estevam wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:57 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: Just did a quick boot test on a imx8mq-evk with v2.2 upstream ATF and it booted fine. Actually I do see some power domain issues when using upstream ATF and booting mainline kernel: [1.57322

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:57 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > Just did a quick boot test on a imx8mq-evk with v2.2 upstream ATF and > it booted fine. Actually I do see some power domain issues when using upstream ATF and booting mainline kernel: [1.573227] imx-pgc imx-pgc-domain.3: failed to comm

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:20 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:09 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > It would be useful to test against the upstream releases and document > > against those rather than random vendor forks, upstream has fairly > > consistent 6 monthl

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peter, On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:09 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > It would be useful to test against the upstream releases and document > against those rather than random vendor forks, upstream has fairly > consistent 6 monthly releases around March/October with the last one > being 2.2. I agr

RE: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Peng Fan
> Subject: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch > > Following the README instructions leads to a non-booting > U-Boot: > > U-Boot SPL 2020.01-rc3-00070-g9a0cbae22a (Nov 25 2019 - 13:08:24 -0300) > PMIC: PFUZE100 ID=0x10 > DDRINFO: start DRAM init > DDRINFO:ddrphy calibration done >

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 4:02 PM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:14 AM Schrempf Frieder > wrote: > > > Just for the record: I am using upstream ATF for my custom i.MX8MM board > > with mainline U-Boot and it just works fine. I didn't run into any > > issues so far and I'm still

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:14 AM Schrempf Frieder wrote: > Just for the record: I am using upstream ATF for my custom i.MX8MM board > with mainline U-Boot and it just works fine. I didn't run into any > issues so far and I'm still on ATF revision 3441952f61a6 and haven't > updated for quite a whi

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Schrempf Frieder
On 11.12.19 15:05, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Peng, > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:00 AM Peng Fan wrote: > >> We might need to switch upstream ATF, or stick to NXP vendor release one? > > I don't have much background about the ATF upstream status on i.MX8 to > provide an opinion. > > Does upstr

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peng, On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Peng Fan wrote: > Not tried. Keep vendor version is fine for now. If you are happy with this patch, could you please provide your Acked-by? I would like to keep the README accurate for the upcoming 2020.01 release. Thanks

RE: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Peng Fan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch > > Hi Peng, > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:00 AM Peng Fan wrote: > > > We might need to switch upstream ATF, or stick to NXP vendor release one? > > I don't have much background about

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peng, On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:00 AM Peng Fan wrote: > We might need to switch upstream ATF, or stick to NXP vendor release one? I don't have much background about the ATF upstream status on i.MX8 to provide an opinion. Does upstream ATF allow booting a U-Boot and mainline kernel? This p

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Adam Ford
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 8:00 AM Peng Fan wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:49 AM Fabio Estevam > > wrote: > > > > > > Following the README instructions leads to a non-booting

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Adam, On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:56 AM Adam Ford wrote: > Shouldn't we address the mix-match of the firmware-imx versions as well? > > I just increasing numbers over and over, and I was able to use > firmware 8.5 which. > > The readme lists both 7.9 and 8.0. There is also a typo on the line

RE: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Peng Fan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:49 AM Fabio Estevam > wrote: > > > > Following the README instructions leads to a non-booting > > U-Boot: > > > > U-Boot SPL 2020.01-rc3-00070-g9a0cbae22a (

Re: [PATCH] imx8mq_evk: Update the required ATF branch

2019-12-11 Thread Adam Ford
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:49 AM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Following the README instructions leads to a non-booting > U-Boot: > > U-Boot SPL 2020.01-rc3-00070-g9a0cbae22a (Nov 25 2019 - 13:08:24 -0300) > PMIC: PFUZE100 ID=0x10 > DDRINFO: start DRAM init > DDRINFO:ddrphy calibration done > DDRINFO: