On 22.11.24 01:30, Chris Packham wrote:
Enable IPV6 support for the x530 board.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese
Thanks,
Stefan
---
configs/x530_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/x530_defconfig b/configs/x530_defconfig
index
On 22.11.24 01:30, Chris Packham wrote:
Enable IPV6 support for the x240 board.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese
Thanks,
Stefan
---
configs/x240_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/x240_defconfig b/configs/x240_defconfig
index
Enable IPV6 support for the x240 board.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
configs/x240_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/x240_defconfig b/configs/x240_defconfig
index 5e5b467b7bac..ff64916204cc 100644
--- a/configs/x240_defconfig
+++ b/configs/x240_defconfig
Enable IPV6 support for the x530 board.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
configs/x530_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/x530_defconfig b/configs/x530_defconfig
index a5b1cc3f8e89..815370c90ecc 100644
--- a/configs/x530_defconfig
+++ b/configs/x530_defconfig
On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 03:13 +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> «Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!»
>
> On 12/2/22 10:18, Viacheslav Mitrofanov wrote:
> > Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
> > neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is
On 12/2/22 10:18, Viacheslav Mitrofanov wrote:
Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
handle IPv6 packets.
Signed-off-by: Viachesl
The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
force using IPv6. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
the same
Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
handle IPv6 packets.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov
Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried
Reviewed-by
This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
It is based on Chris's Packham patches
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
Chris's patches were taken as base. There were efforts to launch it on
HiFive SiFive Unmatched board but the board didn't work
i.com;
w...@denx.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de; judge.pack...@gmail.com; li...@yadro.com;
s...@chromium.org
Тема: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] IPv6 support
«Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!»
Hi Tom and others,
> > Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to
Hi Tom and others,
> > Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to
> > exclude them from the build if IPV6 is not configured?
>
> There's two parts to this, yes. Sandbox needs to enable ipv6 so that
> the tests are run, and the tests need to be be appropriately ifdef'd
o.com;
s...@chromium.org
Тема: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] IPv6 support
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:39:36AM +, Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V wrote:
> Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to
> exclude them from the build if IPV6 is not configured?
There's two pa
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:39:36AM +, Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V wrote:
> Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to
> exclude them from the build if IPV6 is not configured?
There's two parts to this, yes. Sandbox needs to enable ipv6 so that
the tests are run, and
...@ni.com; w...@denx.de;
u-boot@lists.denx.de; judge.pack...@gmail.com; li...@yadro.com;
s...@chromium.org
Тема: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] IPv6 support
Hello Tom!
I tested this problem and I think it is necessary to set CONFIG_IPV6.
Without that option tests fail.
Thanks
...@denx.de;
u-boot@lists.denx.de; judge.pack...@gmail.com; li...@yadro.com;
s...@chromium.org
Тема: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] IPv6 support
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 02:58:48PM +0300, Viacheslav Mitrofanov wrote:
> This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
> It is based on Chris's Pack
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 02:58:48PM +0300, Viacheslav Mitrofanov wrote:
> This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
> It is based on Chris's Packham patches
> (https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
> Chris's patches were taken as base.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:10 PM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
> instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
> to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
> force u
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:10 PM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
> neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
> main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
> handle IPv6 packets.
>
> S
On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 14:58 +0300, Viacheslav Mitrofanov wrote:
> This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
> It is based on Chris's Packham patches
> (https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
> Chris's patches were taken as base. There wer
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 05:59, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
> neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
> main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
> handle IPv6 packets.
>
> Si
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 05:59, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
> instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
> to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
> force us
The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
force using IPv6. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
the same
Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
handle IPv6 packets.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov
---
net/net.c | 23 +
This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
It is based on Chris's Packham patches
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
Chris's patches were taken as base. There were efforts to launch it on
HiFive SiFive Unmatched board but the board didn't work
The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
force using IPv6. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
the same
Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
handle IPv6 packets.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov
---
net/net.c | 23 +
This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
It is based on Chris's Packham patches
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
Chris's patches were taken as base. There were efforts to launch it on
HiFive
SiFive Unmatched board but the board didn't work
On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 20:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> «Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!»
>
> Hi Viacheslav,
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 07:00, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
> wrote:
> > This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
> > It is based on Chri
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 17:48 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> «Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!»
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:36 AM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 21:01 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
> >
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:36 AM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 21:01 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 14:00 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:10 AM
Hi Viacheslav,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 07:00, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
> It is based on Chris's Packham patches
> (https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
> Chris's patches were taken as ba
Hi Viacheslav,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 07:02, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
> instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
> to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it
The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default. Add the possibility to use IPv6
instead. If an address in the command is an IPv6 address it will use IPv6
to boot or if there is a suffix -ipv6 in the end of the command it also
force using IPv6. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
the same
Add net_ip6_handler (an IPv6 packet handler) into net_loop. Add
neighbor discovery mechanism into network init process. That is the
main step to run IPv6 in u-boot. Now u-boot is capable to use NDP and
handle IPv6 packets.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov
---
net/net.c | 23 +
This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
It is based on Chris's Packham patches
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
Chris's patches were taken as base. There were efforts to launch it on HiFive
SiFive Unmatched board but the board didn't work
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 21:01 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 14:00 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:10 AM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
> > > wrote:
> > > > The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 14:00 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:10 AM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
> > wrote:
> > > The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default, to use IPv6 instead add
> > > -ipv6
> > > as the last arg
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 14:00 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:10 AM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
> wrote:
> > The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default, to use IPv6 instead add
> > -ipv6
> > as the last argument. All other tftpboot features and parameters
> > are left
> > the same.
>
The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default, to use IPv6 instead add -ipv6
as the last argument. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
the same.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov
---
cmd/net.c | 21 ++
net/net.c | 17 +--
net/tftp.c | 62 +
This patch set adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot.
It is based on Chris's Packham patches
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-January/279366.html)
Chris's patches were taken as base. There were efforts to launch it on HiFive
SiFive Unmatched board but the board didn't work
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:10 AM Viacheslav Mitrofanov
wrote:
>
> The command tftpboot uses IPv4 by default, to use IPv6 instead add -ipv6
> as the last argument. All other tftpboot features and parameters are left
> the same.
>
In my opinion, we should be able to detect if a user has provided or
Does uboot currently support IPv6? If so, how mature/stable is it?
Thanks,
Raymond
Hi Chris,
On 25 January 2017 at 01:56, Chris Packham wrote:
> Adds basic support for IPv6. Neighbor discovery and ping6 are the only
> things supported at the moment.
>
> Helped-by: Hanna Hawa [endian & alignment fixes]
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
>
> ---
> Now we have something functional.
On 25 January 2017 at 01:56, Chris Packham wrote:
> This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
> earlier work on this[1]. This latest version is itself a reboot of work
> that was last posted to the list in late 2015. Right now I've just
> rebased
This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
earlier work on this[1]. This latest version is itself a reboot of work
that was last posted to the list in late 2015. Right now I've just
rebased against master so functionally it is little different to what
was last p
Adds basic support for IPv6. Neighbor discovery and ping6 are the only
things supported at the moment.
Helped-by: Hanna Hawa [endian & alignment fixes]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
Now we have something functional. With this and the next patch you can
do something like 'setenv ipaddr6 3ffe:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> Adds basic support for IPv6. Neighbor discovery and ping6 are the only
> things supported at the moment.
ping6 is not supported at this moment... not until the next moment.
>
> Helped-by: Hanna Hawa [endian & alignment fixes]
> Signed-off-b
Adds basic support for IPv6. Neighbor discovery and ping6 are the only
things supported at the moment.
Helped-by: Hanna Hawa [endian & alignment fixes]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
Now we have something functional. With this and the next patch you can
do something like 'setenv ipaddr6 3ffe:
This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
earlier work on this[1].
Most of this is ported from Allied Telesis' additions to u-boot[2].
(Note that I am employed by Allied Telesis[3]). The hard work was done
some time ago by Angga, I've cleaned it up and
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Joe Hershberger
> wrote:
>
>
>>> I'm actually testing with x86 on QEMU so I think LE is all good. I'll
>>> remove the comment.
>>
>> Great. Have you done any testing in sandbox? I'd really like to s
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Joe Hershberger
wrote:
>> I'm actually testing with x86 on QEMU so I think LE is all good. I'll
>> remove the comment.
>
> Great. Have you done any testing in sandbox? I'd really like to see
> unit tests go in as part of this series.
>
I'll take a look. For the p
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I've answered a few questions below. I'll address your comments more
> completely before sending another round next week (or I can sit on it
> for longer if you want me to give you some breathing room).
Feel free to sen
; +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_PING
>> +extern struct in6_addr net_ping_ip6; /* the ipv6 address to ping */
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /* :::0:0/96 is reserved for v4 mapped addresses */
>> static inline int ipv6_addr_v4mapped(const struct in6_addr *a)
>> {
&g
(struct in6_addr *saddr,
> + struct in6_addr *daddr, __u16 len,
> + unsigned short proto, unsigned int csum);
> +
> +int ip6_add_hdr(uchar *xip, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dest,
> + int nex
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
> earlier work on this[1]. Technically this is v4 of the series but with
> the amount of time that has passed, rebasing and running though
> checkpatc
Cc : jp.tos...@acksys.fr; han...@marvell.com; Angga; Chris Packham; Tom
> Rini; Simon Glass; Masahiro Yamada
> Objet : [RFC PATCH 0/8] IPv6 support
>
> This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
> earlier work on this[1]. Technically this is v4 of the serie
+{
+ memcpy((void *)to, from, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
+}
#endif /* __NET6_H__ */
diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 77a2f7e..ee198c1 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -22,4 +22,9 @@ config NETCONSOLE
Support the 'nc' input/output device
This series adds basic IPv6 support to U-boot. It is a reboot of my
earlier work on this[1]. Technically this is v4 of the series but with
the amount of time that has passed, rebasing and running though
checkpatch as well as the support for TFTP I've decided to reset the
counter back to 1.
From: Chris Packham
Adds basic support for IPv6. Neighbor discovery and ping6 are the only
things supported at the moment. Stub code exists for UDP but it is
untested and unlikely to work.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
This patch is bigger than I'd like it to be but I'm not sure how to
spli
nitial net6.h
lib/vsprintf.c: add IPv6 compressed format %pI6c
lib/net_utils.c: make string_to_ip stricter
lib/net_utils.c: add string_to_ip6
common.h: add getenv_IP6addr
tsec: enable promiscuous mode for IPv6
net: ipv6 support
common/cmd_net.c | 27 +
drivers/net/tsec.c | 4 +
i
Dear Chris,
In message <50fbb7ea.10...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> The POSIX solution for this is to use sockaddr which encompasses both v4
> and v6 addresses (as well as other socket types). Do we want to add a
> wrapper type or just work with void *?
Without checking for implications for the impl
Dear Chris,
In message
you wrote:
>
> RFC5970[1] details network boot options for DHCPv6 (I think it's the
> ratified version of the draft you linked to). Basically this allows the
> server to specify a URL for the boot file which presumably could be
> something like tftp://[2001:db8::1]/uImage.
Hi Wolfgang,
A a few more specific answers to your questions
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 01/18/2013 11:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Chris,
> >
> > Last time I checked (about 2 years ago) there was no officially
> > agreed-on standard for example how networ
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:44:39 +1300, Chris Packham
> wrote:
>
> > TFTP over IPv6 as well as PING6. Our use case is just static address
> > configuration but using link-local addresses should be doable. I was
> > thinking it wo
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:44:39 +1300, Chris Packham
wrote:
> TFTP over IPv6 as well as PING6. Our use case is just static address
> configuration but using link-local addresses should be doable. I was
> thinking it wouldn't be to hard to implement something to generate a
> global IPv6 ad
On 01/19/2013 07:41 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Chris,
>>
>> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>> Personally I'm happy to have a long running series and periodically send
>>> updates to the list. I have a repository o
On 01/18/2013 11:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Good question. Basically we have some out of tree code that implements a
>> basic IPv6 stack. I'm drip feeding the code in pieces to avoid just
>> dumping it on people and becaus
On 01/18/2013 11:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <1358472932-32083-1-git-send-email-judge.pack...@gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
>> printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
>> things
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>> Personally I'm happy to have a long running series and periodically send
>> updates to the list. I have a repository on github[1] which has an ipv6
>> branch collecting my
Dear Chris,
In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Good question. Basically we have some out of tree code that implements a
> basic IPv6 stack. I'm drip feeding the code in pieces to avoid just
> dumping it on people and because the current code wouldn't meet u-boot's
> standards.
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <20130118092041.0c827374@lilith> you wrote:
>
> > This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> > printing/parsing of addresses.
>
> As a general comment, I heartily welcome IPv6 support (even though I
Me too! :-)
&
Dear Chris,
In message <1358472932-32083-1-git-send-email-judge.pack...@gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
> things which I haven't included in this series yet. Is there a
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:39:29PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> Putting my IPv6 promoter hat on I hope that it won't stay dead for long :)
>From my side, IPv6 is long awaited feature by me and various people,
so it won't stay dead.
___
U-Boot mailing l
> As a general comment, I heartily welcome IPv6 support (even though I
> suspect there is quite a lot to be done on it, if only configuration),
> but I wonder how this fits in with the general line of not adding dead
> code in U-Boot. Will we make an exception for IPv6 and accept this R
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:27 +1300, Chris Packham
wrote:
> From: Chris Packham
>
> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> printing/parsing of addresses.
As a general comment, I heartily welcome IPv6 support (even though I
suspect there is quite
From: Chris Packham
This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
things which I haven't included in this series yet. Is there a unittest
facility for u-boot I should be using?
A few open questions
1) Presumab
On 01/16/2013 11:01 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> #
> Scanned by MailMarshal - M86 Security's comprehensive email content security
> solution.
>
Here's something simple to get started. IP6addr_t is added as a typedef
(for consistency with IPaddr_t). I ended up borrowing and adapting the
vsprintf code from Linux.
Here is an example of the printf formatting
With this code
IP6addr_t addr6 = {.u6_addr16[0] = 0x3ffe,
.u
re at $dayjob we make embedded network devices (routers & switches).
>> > Because we have an interest in getting people to adopt IPv6 we've added
>> > code
>> > to our local u-boot repository to add basic IPv6 support on our boards.
>> > It's
>&g
people to adopt IPv6 we've added
> code
> > to our local u-boot repository to add basic IPv6 support on our boards.
> It's
> > not a fully conformant IPv6 host implementation but it is enough to be
> able
> > to statically configure an IPv6 address and downloa
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here at $dayjob we make embedded network devices (routers & switches).
> Because we have an interest in getting people to adopt IPv6 we've added code
> to our local u-boot repository to add basic IP
Hi,
Here at $dayjob we make embedded network devices (routers & switches).
Because we have an interest in getting people to adopt IPv6 we've added
code to our local u-boot repository to add basic IPv6 support on our
boards. It's not a fully conformant IPv6 host implementation but i
Thanks
do you know of any plans to support it in the near future ?
see this proposal from wolfgang denx:
http://elinux.org/CELF_Project_Proposal/Add_IPV6_support_to_U-Boot
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:52 AM, amruth vamadev wrote:
> No it is not supported.
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, yehu
Hello everyone
Does u-boot currently support IPv6 ?
i have seen several proposals to support IPv6 and also some implementations
for specific Soc but havent found any indication for generic support of IPv6
If not supported , is there a plan to support it soon ?
Thanks
Yehuda
__
84 matches
Mail list logo
