Hello All,
>> 2009/6/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
>> > On 16:54 Fri 05 Jun , RONETIX - Ilko Iliev wrote:
>> >> This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
>> >> for AT91SAM9261.
>> >> Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
>> >> AT
On 21:17 Tue 09 Jun , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2009/6/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> > On 16:54 Fri 05 Jun , RONETIX - Ilko Iliev wrote:
> >> This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
> >> for AT91SAM9261.
> >> Because of the missing PLLB initiali
Hello,
2009/6/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 16:54 Fri 05 Jun , RONETIX - Ilko Iliev wrote:
>> This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
>> for AT91SAM9261.
>> Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
>> AT91SAM9261 based boards
On 16:54 Fri 05 Jun , RONETIX - Ilko Iliev wrote:
> This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
> for AT91SAM9261.
> Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
> AT91SAM9261 based boards will work only if the PLLB is configured by a
> preced
This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
for AT91SAM9261.
Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
AT91SAM9261 based boards will work only if the PLLB is configured by a
precedent bootloader.
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev
diff --git a/driver
Hi,
>> In that case the description is wrong. It states:
>> > the USB support for all AT91SAM9261 based boards doesn't work.
>> Look at the word 'ALL', that mislead me here...
> ok I've not tick on the all
>
> why not replace with
> the USB support for all AT91SAM9261 based boards will only work i
Hello,
>> Well, the PLLB should be configured correctly by the AT91-bootstrap
>> code (from Atmel).
> no this is the case only if you supposed that you use U-Boot as second
> stage bootloader which is not the case for the PM9263, PM9261 and other
> boards (9263ek too for norflash boot as example)
On 22:20 Sat 02 May , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >> Well, the PLLB should be configured correctly by the AT91-bootstrap
> >> code (from Atmel).
> > no this is the case only if you supposed that you use U-Boot as second
> > stage bootloader which is not the case for the PM9263, PM9261 and
On 21:27 Sat 02 May , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2009/5/2 RONETIX - Ilko Iliev :
> > This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
> > for AT91SAM9261.
> > Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
> > AT91SAM9261 based boards doesn't work
Hello,
2009/5/2 RONETIX - Ilko Iliev :
> This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
> for AT91SAM9261.
> Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
> AT91SAM9261 based boards doesn't work.
Well, the PLLB should be configured correctly by the AT9
This patch corrects the missing PLLB initialization in usb_cpu_init()
for AT91SAM9261.
Because of the missing PLLB initialization, the USB support for all
AT91SAM9261 based boards doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
i
11 matches
Mail list logo
