2017-02-27 10:07 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Majewski :
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:27:42 +0100
> Eric BOUXIROT wrote:
>
>> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
>> module.
>>
>> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>>
>> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by
Hi Lukasz,
>> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
>> module.
>>
>> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>>
>> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
>> arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
>
> Could you try to use newer gcc and see if boo
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:27:42 +0100
Eric BOUXIROT wrote:
> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
> module.
>
> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>
> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
> arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
Could y
Hi everyone,
I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc module.
u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
My problem is when i use DHCP command to retrieve a file from
Hi, Wolfgang:
The wiki (http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/TaskTimerAPI) introduced new
U-Boot Timer API, such as:
time_ms_delta_raw()
time_ms_delta_max()
..
Not find in 2014.07 code package.
Were they not adopted by u-boot maintainer?
Best wishes,
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 18:27 +0800, tiger...@via-alliance.com wrote:
> Hi, Scott:
>
> I have a question about nand_scan_bbt() function in
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c .
>
> ……
>
> len = (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift); // bbt_erase_shift = 18
> (256KB)
>
> len += (len >>
Hi, Scott:
I have a question about nand_scan_bbt() function in
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c .
..
len = (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift); // bbt_erase_shift = 18
(256KB)
len += (len >> this->page_shift) * mtd->oobsize;
buf = vmalloc(len);
..
Hi, Denk:
Thanks a lot!
I got it!
Not exceed CONFIG_SYS_PBSIZE defined in my platform config file is a
good choice!
>What exactly was your reason to worry about the maximum size for env
>vars?
My colleage wanted to save a variable which contains 8KB data.
He asked me whether it was ok for u-boot c
Dear tiger...@via-alliance.com,
In message you
wrote:
>
> I want to know the size limit for a single env variable.
In theory the size of the variable is only limited by the free room in
the envrionment (the size of which you configure in your board config
file).
> I have reviewed the code:
>
Hi, experts:
I want to know the size limit for a single env variable.
I have reviewed the code:
1. It seems the size limit for a single env variable is 1M bytes, right?
#defineMAX_ENV_SIZE (1 << 20) /* 1 MiB */
(in common/cmd_nvedit.c)
Best wishes,
___
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 10:13 +0800, tiger...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
> It's confused that search BBT and write BBT uses different mtd ops
> mode. And also data will not be valid if U-boot uses mtd ops
> MTD_OOB_RAW during reading and no software ECC is implemented.
>
> I also noticed that in U-boot2
Hi , Scott:
First, My uboot version is 2013.04.
In the function scan_write_bbt(), U-boot uses MTD_OOB_PLACE to write BBT
data and BBT pattern. See ">>>" below
static int scan_write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *oob)
I would agree with the idea moving pl310 functionality into
pl310-specific files - armv7 doesn't dictate use of pl310 (or an
external cache controller of any nature) at least for about half the
possible cores you could go find. Those that need/configure for an
external L2 controller may not even re
Hi, experts:
There are 4 functions definition in arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h .
But not implemented in cache-pl310.c file.
And the implemented functions in cache-pl310.c file are defined in
arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h .
So, maybe pl310.h should be deleted?
Or function declarations are m
Hi,
I search the FAQs, but didn't quite find the right answer. I'm trying to
understand how to load a binary from either U-Boot or directly from the
bootstrapping that loads U-Boot (instead of U-Boot) and preferable multiple
binaries at once (from the code automatically the way the bootstrappin
Hello, All!
Can you please answer the following questions:
* Is there an ability to access files stored on a UBIFS partition on a
flash drive connected via SPI?
* If yes, are there any pitfalls in using UBIFS with SPI?
I will be glad to get any comments on this topic.
Regards
Stas
16 matches
Mail list logo