Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot on IMX.51 EVK

2011-01-11 Thread Stefano Babic
On 01/12/2011 02:34 AM, Thomas Besemer wrote: > Hi Stefano - > Hi Thomas, > Looks like the problem I was having is the Freescale SDK (LTIB) had a > .config file that ended up with the wrong load address; was picking up > the MX53 (0x70008000 versus 0x90008000) load/build addys. Well, then it is

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot on IMX.51 EVK

2011-01-11 Thread Jason Liu
Hi, Thomas 2011/1/12 Thomas Besemer : > Hi Stefano - > > Looks like the problem I was having is the Freescale SDK (LTIB) had a > .config file that ended up with the wrong load address; was picking up the > MX53 (0x70008000 versus 0x90008000) load/build addys.  Don't know why it > ever worked  

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot on IMX.51 EVK

2011-01-11 Thread Thomas Besemer
Hi Stefano - Thanks for your very quick response to my posting. I'm going to follow up just for informational purposes, as I was able to get Freescale SDK (LTIB) Kernel to boot find with current U-Boot. > > - Should above "raw" load from SD work? Probably my preference, but > have > > an op

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot on IMX.51 EVK

2011-01-11 Thread Stefano Babic
On 01/11/2011 03:02 AM, Thomas Besemer wrote: > Hi Group - > Hi Thomas, > - Is above version of U-Boot known to work on EVK? As far as I know, yes. > It appears that this > version supports DOS partitions on SD card, They are additional features, as reading files from a formatted SD is ver

[U-Boot] U-Boot on IMX.51 EVK

2011-01-10 Thread Thomas Besemer
Hi Group - I am working with the imx.51 on the Freescale EVK. Up to this point, have been working with the version of U-Boot (and Kernel) from the Freescale web site; the SDK which is LTIB based. Pretty stale stuff; U-Boot is rather old (8/2009), as with Kernel (2.6.31). I pulled U-Boot before