Re: [U-Boot] Patch submission process question

2011-08-17 Thread Simon Schwarz
On 08/16/2011 06:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >>> How about a patch that was sent, that at the time didn't depend on >>> another series, but after review and changes, now depends on those >>> changes? >> Then you have to note it in the version history that it now depends on >> another patch - don't fo

Re: [U-Boot] Patch submission process question

2011-08-16 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 08/16/2011 02:06 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote: >> On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: >>> Even a bit more generally, some of the series are getting quite long >>> due to small dependencies. This tends to put lots of unrelated >>> cont

Re: [U-Boot] Patch submission process question

2011-08-16 Thread Scott Wood
On 08/16/2011 02:06 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> Hi u-boot, >> >> What is the recommended way to handle a patch series that depends on >> another patch series (already sent but not integrated)? >> > AFAIK the recommend way is to note in t

Re: [U-Boot] Patch submission process question

2011-08-16 Thread Simon Schwarz
Hi Joe, On 08/16/2011 03:20 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi u-boot, > > What is the recommended way to handle a patch series that depends on > another patch series (already sent but not integrated)? > AFAIK the recommend way is to note in the patch that it depends on another - best with some kind

[U-Boot] Patch submission process question

2011-08-15 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi u-boot, What is the recommended way to handle a patch series that depends on another patch series (already sent but not integrated)? How about a patch that was sent, that at the time didn't depend on another series, but after review and changes, now depends on those changes? Even a bit more g