On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:11:40PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20141104220213.GN15133@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Hm is there a way to determine in advance where we are passing a
> > > number as argument [see "common/cmd_fdt.c" lines 260ff] ?
> >
> > The pr
Dear Tom,
In message <20141104220213.GN15133@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Hm is there a way to determine in advance where we are passing a
> > number as argument [see "common/cmd_fdt.c" lines 260ff] ?
>
> The problem is that 'fdt set ... ' is valid and 'fdt set ...
> <0xhex>' is valid (as
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20141104205800.GM15133@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Well, we probably should not use this FDT centric decoding function
> > > directly on arguments passed from the U-Boot command line.
> >
> > No, lo
Dear Tom,
In message <20141104205800.GM15133@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Well, we probably should not use this FDT centric decoding function
> > directly on arguments passed from the U-Boot command line.
>
> No, look again at what we're doing. We're not calling a U-Boot function
> to do U-Bo
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:53:02PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ian,
>
> In message <1415116135.11486.51.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Parse the user's input, partially heuristic. Valid formats:
> > > > * <0x00112233 4 05>- an array of cells. Numbers follo
Dear Ian,
In message <1415116135.11486.51.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
>
> > > /*
> > > * Parse the user's input, partially heuristic. Valid formats:
> > > * <0x00112233 4 05> - an array of cells. Numbers follow standard
> > > *C conventions.
> > > * [00 11 2
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:32:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:21 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Dear Ian,
> > >
> > > In message <1414677435.2064.34.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> > > > It seems there is some
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:32:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:21 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Ian,
> >
> > In message <1414677435.2064.34.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> > > It seems there is some inconsistency wrt number base between commands
> > > which set
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:21 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ian,
>
> In message <1414677435.2064.34.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> > It seems there is some inconsistency wrt number base between commands
> > which set $filesize in the env and the commands which might consume
> > them.
>
> T
Dear Ian,
In message <1414677435.2064.34.ca...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> It seems there is some inconsistency wrt number base between commands
> which set $filesize in the env and the commands which might consume
> them.
That would be bugs, then.
>
> sun7i# load scsi 0 $fdt_a
It seems there is some inconsistency wrt number base between commands
which set $filesize in the env and the commands which might consume
them.
e.g.
sun7i# load scsi 0 $fdt_addr_r dtbs/$fdtfile
21639 bytes read in 191 ms (110.4 KiB/s)
sun7i# printenv filesize
11 matches
Mail list logo
