Hi Larry,
On 26.06.13 03:55, Larry Baker wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
>
>> Hi Larry Baker,
>>
>> On 06/26/2013 02:02 AM, Larry Baker wrote:
>>> On 24 Jun 2013, at 1:22 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
>>>
Hi Larry Baker,
On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
BTW,
On Jun 25, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Larry Baker,
>
> On 06/26/2013 02:02 AM, Larry Baker wrote:
>> On 24 Jun 2013, at 1:22 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Larry Baker,
>>>
>>> On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation
Hi Larry Baker,
On 06/26/2013 02:02 AM, Larry Baker wrote:
On 24 Jun 2013, at 1:22 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Larry Baker,
On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation
GESBC-9G20 board. Two causes: a bad code text segment address
(preven
On 24 Jun 2013, at 1:22 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Larry Baker,
>
> On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
>> I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation GESBC-9G20
>> board. Two causes: a bad code text segment address (prevents U-Boot from
>> executing) and bad flash partiti
Hi Larry Baker,
Please stop top posting.
On 6/24/2013 16:45, Larry Baker wrote:
Is there a way to know the U-Boot partition size the at91loader expects?
Till now, there is no such function. However, if you use new bootstrap,
it will show useful information as following:
---8>---
AT91Boo
Hi Larry,
On 06/24/2013 10:45 AM, Larry Baker wrote:
> Bo and Andreas,
>
> Thank you all for your guidance. I had no idea the primary bootstrap might
> also have to be upgraded.
>
> Andreas had a concern about the partition size for U-Boot. The latest
> releases are near the limit for the cu
Bo and Andreas,
Thank you all for your guidance. I had no idea the primary bootstrap might
also have to be upgraded.
Andreas had a concern about the partition size for U-Boot. The latest releases
are near the limit for the current flash partition layout. However, I believe
there is 128 Kb a
On 06/24/2013 10:22 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Larry Baker,
>
> On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
>> I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation
>> GESBC-9G20 board. Two causes: a bad code text segment address
>> (prevents U-Boot from executing) and bad flash partition offs
I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation GESBC-9G20
board. Two causes: a bad code text segment address (prevents U-Boot from
executing) and bad flash partition offsets (prevents U-Boot from reading its
environment variables). The latter I assume is common, as the flash
Hi Bo,
On 06/24/2013 09:29 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Larry Baker,
>
> On 6/23/2013 14:34, Larry Baker wrote:
>> I am trying to upgrade U-Boot on a Glomation GESBC-9G20 (a derivative
>> of the Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK) to a version that supports UBIFS. The
>> latest U-Boot does not work. (See also my
Hi Larry Baker,
On 6/24/2013 16:02, Larry Baker wrote:
I have found why the latest U-Boot does not work on my Glomation GESBC-9G20
board. Two causes: a bad code text segment address (prevents U-Boot from
executing) and bad flash partition offsets (prevents U-Boot from reading its
environment
Hi Larry Baker,
On 6/23/2013 14:34, Larry Baker wrote:
I am trying to upgrade U-Boot on a Glomation GESBC-9G20 (a derivative of the
Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK) to a version that supports UBIFS. The latest U-Boot does
not work. (See also my report on the Glomation user forum,
http://glomation.net/
I am trying to upgrade U-Boot on a Glomation GESBC-9G20 (a derivative of the
Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK) to a version that supports UBIFS. The latest U-Boot does
not work. (See also my report on the Glomation user forum,
http://glomation.net/smf/index.php/topic,1389.0.html.)
The GESBC-9G20 comes wi
13 matches
Mail list logo
