Hi Simon,
On 6 January 2016 at 05:54, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 17 December 2015 at 10:06, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 15 December 2015 at 03:44, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>
>>> On 11 December 2015 at 09:57, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 11 Dece
Hi Jagan,
On 17 December 2015 at 10:06, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 15 December 2015 at 03:44, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>> On 11 December 2015 at 09:57, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 11 December 2015 at 07:35, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On 8 Dec
Hi Simon,
On 15 December 2015 at 03:44, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 11 December 2015 at 09:57, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 11 December 2015 at 07:35, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>
>>> On 8 December 2015 at 08:36, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 8 Dece
Hi Jagan,
On 11 December 2015 at 09:57, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 11 December 2015 at 07:35, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>> On 8 December 2015 at 08:36, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 8 December 2015 at 08:22, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On 3 Decem
Hi Simon,
On 11 December 2015 at 07:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 8 December 2015 at 08:36, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 8 December 2015 at 08:22, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>
>>> On 3 December 2015 at 03:10, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi Simon,
I re-phrase
Hi Jagan,
On 8 December 2015 at 08:36, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 8 December 2015 at 08:22, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>> On 3 December 2015 at 03:10, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> I re-phrase all the question from previous thread and continue in this for
>>> more di
Hi Simon,
On 8 December 2015 at 08:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 3 December 2015 at 03:10, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I re-phrase all the question from previous thread and continue in this for
>> more discussion on spi-nor development.
>>
>>> Is it intended that SPI flash s
Hi Jagan,
On 3 December 2015 at 03:10, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I re-phrase all the question from previous thread and continue in this for
> more discussion on spi-nor development.
>
>> Is it intended that SPI flash should be a driver for the MTD uclass?
>> Others would be NAND and CFI.
+ Bin
On 3 December 2015 at 15:40, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I re-phrase all the question from previous thread and continue in this for
> more discussion on spi-nor development.
>
>> Is it intended that SPI flash should be a driver for the MTD uclass?
>> Others would be NAND and CFI. From
Hi Simon,
I re-phrase all the question from previous thread and continue in this
for more discussion on spi-nor development.
> Is it intended that SPI flash should be a driver for the MTD uclass?
> Others would be NAND and CFI. From what I can tell MTD has the same
> operations as SPI flash (e
10 matches
Mail list logo