On 06/12/13 17:21, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:48 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> On 12/06/2013 04:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> (damn linux-sunxi reply-to vs. evolution madness ate your copy Marc,
>>> sorry!)
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:59 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
O
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:48 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 04:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > (damn linux-sunxi reply-to vs. evolution madness ate your copy Marc,
> > sorry!)
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:59 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:12 +, Marc Zyn
On 12/06/2013 04:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
(damn linux-sunxi reply-to vs. evolution madness ate your copy Marc,
sorry!)
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:59 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:12 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
BTW: Yesterday my PSCI host patches for Xen have been committed
(damn linux-sunxi reply-to vs. evolution madness ate your copy Marc,
sorry!)
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:59 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:12 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > BTW: Yesterday my PSCI host patches for Xen have been committed, so Xen
> > > should be able to use th
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:12 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > BTW: Yesterday my PSCI host patches for Xen have been committed, so Xen
> > should be able to use that feature just like the kernel does.
>
> Excellent! I really need to sort these patches out and repost the whole
> series...
I was hopin
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:30:27PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here.
> >> Also, if secured firmware is an independent binar
On 22/11/13 08:40, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 15:04 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 21/11/13 14:28, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
PSCI is an ARM standard that provides a generic interface that
supervisory softw
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:26 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> If you link secure firmware inside u-boot image then we will have to reflash
> or update entire u-boot image whenever we want to update the secure
> firmware.
Only if you make your secure firmware part of u-boot. Nothing says you
have to. You
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 15:04 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 21/11/13 14:28, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> >> PSCI is an ARM standard that provides a generic interface that
>> >>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here.
>> Also, if secured firmware is an independent binary then it need not be
>> open source.
>
> In which case it should/ca
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here.
> Also, if secured firmware is an independent binary then it need not be
> open source.
In which case it should/can not have anything to do with u-boot nor
reuse any GPL'd u-bo
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 15:04 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 21/11/13 14:28, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> PSCI is an ARM standard that provides a generic interface that
> >> supervisory software can use to manage power in the followin
12 matches
Mail list logo
