On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here. > Also, if secured firmware is an independent binary then it need not be > open source.
In which case it should/can not have anything to do with u-boot nor reuse any GPL'd u-boot code. The platform should supply the PSCI service itself if you want to do this. I for one don't see this as an advantage. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
