On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:13 -0500, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote :
> >
> > > >
> > > > 2) TNY_A9260.ERR, TNY_A9G20.ERR:
> > > >
> > > > nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
> > > > CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
> > >
> > > Same here, I can submit simple 1 line patches for
Dear rhabarber1848,
In message you wrote:
>
> I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
> perfectly well with unchanged config.
> But now U-Boot raises an exception during machine check:
>
> =
>
Hi rhabarber1848,
>> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you
>> plan to submit this support here sometime?
>
> the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree
> in our public CVS.
So why not move mainline? Usually it's pretty fun to get o
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Apart from that, I'd strongly start looking for implications of the
> recent rewrite of the relocation strategy to code not in mainline.
Hi,
with great relieve I can say the removing "*(.fixup)" from the *.lds
files solved the problem:
Hi,
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you
> plan to submit this support here sometime?
the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree
in our public CVS.
After unpacking U-Boo
Hi rhabarber1848,
> I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
> perfectly well with unchanged config.
> But now U-Boot raises an exception during machine check:
>
> =
> U-Boot 2009.11 (Tuxbox) (No
Am Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:42:10 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> just in case you did not notice yet: U-Boot v2009.11-rc1 was released
> last night.
Hi,
I just tested it on my Dbox2 board where U-Boot 2009.08 is working
perfectly well with unchanged config.
But now U-Boot raises an exception during
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
2) TNY_A9260.ERR, TNY_A9G20.ERR:
nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
>>> Same here, I can submit simple 1 line patches for these
>> Thanks, but this is also Albin's bailiwick.
>
> I submit
>
> > >
> > > 2) TNY_A9260.ERR, TNY_A9G20.ERR:
> > >
> > > nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
> > > CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
> >
> > Same here, I can submit simple 1 line patches for these
>
> Thanks, but this is also Albin's bailiwick.
I submitted two 1
Dear "Paulraj, Sandeep",
In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d93957...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> you
wrote:
>
> > ARM: lots of issues:
> > =
> >
> > 1) SBC35_A9G20:
> >
> > nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
> > CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
> > m41
> ARM: lots of issues:
> =
>
> 1) SBC35_A9G20:
>
> nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
> CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
> m41t94.c: In function 'rtc_reset':
> m41t94.c:123: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning
> void
Wolfgang, th
Helleo all,
just in case you did not notice yet: U-Boot v2009.11-rc1 was released
last night.
Summary of state:
ARM: lots of issues:
=
1) SBC35_A9G20:
nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct output!
m41t94.c: In function 'rtc
12 matches
Mail list logo