Dear Ben Gardiner,
In message you
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ben Gardiner
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >> Can you try
> >>
> >> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-testing.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/arm-reloc-and-cache-support
>
> This i
Hello Ben,
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ben Gardiner
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Can you try
>>>
>>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-testing.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/arm-reloc-and-cache-support
>
> This is the commit fr
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ben Gardiner
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Can you try
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-testing.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/arm-reloc-and-cache-support
This is the commit from which I was working -- there have been no
Hello Heiko,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> Thanks for trying this patches!
My pleasure! Thank you for doing the hard work.
> Ben Gardiner wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Ben Gardiner
>> wrote:
>> I did get an openocd debugger going with uboo
Hello Ben,
Thanks for trying this patches!
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Ben Gardiner
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Reinhard Meyer
>> wrote:
>>> The value loaded into SP is IN the location at PC+808... look there.
About in 0xc1080078+0x0328 give or t
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Ben Gardiner
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Reinhard Meyer
> wrote:
>> The value loaded into SP is IN the location at PC+808... look there.
>>>
>>> About in 0xc1080078+0x0328 give or take a word.
>>>
>>
>> And well, the location is mentioned right behin
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Reinhard Meyer
wrote:
> The value loaded into SP is IN the location at PC+808... look there.
>>
>> About in 0xc1080078+0x0328 give or take a word.
>>
>
> And well, the location is mentioned right behind the ;
>
> c1080078: e59fd328 ldr sp, [pc, #80
The value loaded into SP is IN the location at PC+808... look there.
> About in 0xc1080078+0x0328 give or take a word.
>
And well, the location is mentioned right behind the ;
c1080078: e59fd328ldr sp, [pc, #808] ; c10803a8
Reinhard
_
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> But I think that the value loaded to sp is still wrong because of the
> restrictions on immediate arguments in ARM instructions.
>
> with (0x8000 + 128*1024 -16):
> ---
> c1080078 :
> c1080078: e59fd328ldr sp, [pc, #808] ; c10803a8
> c108007c: e3a
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ben Gardiner,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> First, for the 'shared ram' region which is 1...@0x8000 I tried:
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR (0x8000 + 128*1024 -1)
>
> The "-1" is probably a bad idea, as yo
Dear Ben Gardiner,
In message you
wrote:
>
> First, for the 'shared ram' region which is 1...@0x8000 I tried:
> #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR (0x8000 + 128*1024 -1)
The "-1" is probably a bad idea, as your stack will point to an odd
address then. Try and make this "-8" instead. Or "-1
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> Ben Gardiner wrote:
>> I'm sorry I don't have more details than that, it is serial-console
>> connected only and there is no jtag debugger setup here (yet).
>
> I think you must debug this ...
>
>> I'm not sure if the board was
Hello Ben,
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> This has been tested on at91sam9263 and STN8815.
>> Again, I didn't check if it has bad effects
>> on non-arm926 cores.
>>
>> Initially I had a "done" bit to only set up page tables
>> at the beginning. Howe
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> This has been tested on at91sam9263 and STN8815.
> Again, I didn't check if it has bad effects
> on non-arm926 cores.
>
> Initially I had a "done" bit to only set up page tables
> at the beginning. However, since the aligmnent requirement
> w
This has been tested on at91sam9263 and STN8815.
Again, I didn't check if it has bad effects
on non-arm926 cores.
Initially I had a "done" bit to only set up page tables
at the beginning. However, since the aligmnent requirement
was for the whole object file, this extra integer tool 16kB
in BSS, s
15 matches
Mail list logo
