Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/7] ppc/p4080: Add p4080 platform immap definitions

2009-09-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <19e9b551-f442-4ba2-98a3-c941620e4...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > > Dope, posted the wrong version. I agree w/the long lines, not sure > what to do about it. Move to something like: > > typedef struct ccsr_local { > /* 0x0 - Control Configuration Statu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/7] ppc/p4080: Add p4080 platform immap definitions

2009-09-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <1253380099-27864-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org > > you wrote: >> The p4080 SoC has a significant amount of commonality with the 85xx/ >> PQ3 >> platform. We reuse the 85xx immap and just add new d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/7] ppc/p4080: Add p4080 platform immap definitions

2009-09-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1253380099-27864-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > The p4080 SoC has a significant amount of commonality with the 85xx/PQ3 > platform. We reuse the 85xx immap and just add new definitions for > local access and global utils. The global utils i

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/7] ppc/p4080: Add p4080 platform immap definitions

2009-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
The p4080 SoC has a significant amount of commonality with the 85xx/PQ3 platform. We reuse the 85xx immap and just add new definitions for local access and global utils. The global utils is now broken into global utils, clocking and run control/power management. The offsets from CCSR for a numbe