On 06/25/2013 10:38 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Sebastian Hesselbarth writes:
[...]
I was under the impression that you resent the patches because you have
a CuBox you want to get supported.
Exactly. I'd like to see support for CuBox enter mainline
U-Boot. However, there's also a limit to the amo
Sebastian Hesselbarth writes:
[...]
> I was under the impression that you resent the patches because you have
> a CuBox you want to get supported.
Exactly. I'd like to see support for CuBox enter mainline
U-Boot. However, there's also a limit to the amount of time I can afford
to spend on it (bo
Hello Jagan,
Jagan Teki writes:
> Looks ok to me as per coding style after a quick look.
Thanks for the review.
[...]
> Done use the below tag code instead go for spi_alloc_slave()
> see the sample code on "drivers/spi/exynos_spi.c"
>
> --- TAG+
>> + slave = malloc(s
On 06/25/2013 09:33 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Sebastian Hesselbarth writes:
Either orion_spi as it was named originally, or mv_spi as Prafulla
suggested. Then move mpp (pinctrl) from kirkwood_spi to corresponding
boards, switch to orion_/mv_spi, and remove kirkwood_spi.
I suggest orion_spi, but
Sebastian Hesselbarth writes:
> Either orion_spi as it was named originally, or mv_spi as Prafulla
> suggested. Then move mpp (pinctrl) from kirkwood_spi to corresponding
> boards, switch to orion_/mv_spi, and remove kirkwood_spi.
>
> I suggest orion_spi, but Prafulla had his word so it should be
On 06/12/2013 09:30 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
wrote:
Is any of you even listening? Please do _not_ name it after Dove! It is
compatible with _at least_ Kirkwood, Orion5x and MV78x00. Now is the
chance to have a common name or you will end up
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 08:58 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>
>> On 03-06-2013 23:50, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks ok to me as per coding style after a quick look.
>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Sascha Silbe
>>> wrote:
From: Seba
On 06/12/2013 08:58 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On 03-06-2013 23:50, Jagan Teki wrote:
Looks ok to me as per coding style after a quick look.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
This adds an SPI driver for Marvell Dove SoCs. This driver is taken
from k
Hi,
On 03-06-2013 23:50, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi,
Looks ok to me as per coding style after a quick look.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
This adds an SPI driver for Marvell Dove SoCs. This driver is taken
from kirkwood_spi but removes mpp conf
Hi,
Looks ok to me as per coding style after a quick look.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
>
> This adds an SPI driver for Marvell Dove SoCs. This driver is taken
> from kirkwood_spi but removes mpp configuration as dove has dedicated
> spi pi
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
This adds an SPI driver for Marvell Dove SoCs. This driver is taken
from kirkwood_spi but removes mpp configuration as dove has dedicated
spi pins.
As a future clean-up step, the code for orion5x, kirkwood and dove
could be merged, with MPP configuration being be hand
11 matches
Mail list logo
