On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:57:02AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:13:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >> I'
Hi Tom,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:13:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> I've brought over the patches that I can that don't depend on autoconf:
> >>
> >> 6c0e
Hi Tom,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:13:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> I've brought over the patches that I can that don't depend on autoconf:
>>
>> 6c0e6c9 (HEAD, ws/us-config5, us-config5) main: Add debug_bootkeys to
>> avoid #ifdef
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:13:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
> I've brought over the patches that I can that don't depend on autoconf:
>
> 6c0e6c9 (HEAD, ws/us-config5, us-config5) main: Add debug_bootkeys to
> avoid #ifdefs
> 9777b9f main: Add debug_parser() to avoid #ifdefs
> 2fc85b6 mai
Hi Tom,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:22:04PM -0700, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:21
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:22:04PM -0700, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:3
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:1
Hi Tom,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:10:53AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >
>> >> Many parts of the U-Boot code bas
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:10:53AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> >> Many parts of the U-Boot code base are sprinkled with #ifdefs. This makes
> >> different boards com
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:10:53AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Many parts of the U-Boot code base are sprinkled with #ifdefs. This makes
>> different boards compile different versions of the source code, meaning
>> that we must build a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:10:53AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> Many parts of the U-Boot code base are sprinkled with #ifdefs. This makes
> different boards compile different versions of the source code, meaning
> that we must build all boards to check for failures. It is easy to misspell
> an #ifd
Many parts of the U-Boot code base are sprinkled with #ifdefs. This makes
different boards compile different versions of the source code, meaning
that we must build all boards to check for failures. It is easy to misspell
an #ifdef and there is not as much checking of this by the compiler. Multiple
13 matches
Mail list logo
