On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:57:02AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:13:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > >> I've brought over the patches that I can that don't depend on autoconf: > > >> > > >> 6c0e6c9 (HEAD, ws/us-config5, us-config5) main: Add debug_bootkeys to > > >> avoid #ifdefs > > >> 9777b9f main: Add debug_parser() to avoid #ifdefs > > >> 2fc85b6 main: Correct header order > > >> 24e80be main: Fix typos and checkpatch warnings in command line reading > > >> 9e9e3b9 main: Use get/setenv_ulong() > > >> 1290cb7 main: Move boot_delay code into its own function > > >> cd8f13e main: Separate out the two abortboot() functions > > >> ca2451c net: Add prototype for update_tftp > > >> 4a2a802 at91: Correct CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_PROMPT definition for pm9263 > > >> > > >> I will run these through the builder and send an interim series > > >> without autoconf. We still have a lot of inline #ifdefs, and static > > >> functions and local variables must also be #ifdefed out if not used. > > >> Still, there is some improvement. > > > > > > I've read them over and they look good. Since you didn't re-send > > > anything I assume they passed your builder test and I'll apply them next > > > week (and give them my own builder test like everything else gets). > > > Thanks! > > > > Just checking up if you got to this? I am thinking of respinning the > autoconf series on top of this.
Looking to clear up my patchwork TODO list tomorrow and this is up in there for eligible patches. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
