2009/6/1 Scott Wood :
> Magnus Lilja wrote:
>>
>> 2009/5/30 Magnus Lilja :
>>>
>>> 2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
Does the number of address bytes really need to depend on the size of
the
flash chip, or can you base it on the number of non-zero bytes in
page_address (the chip will
Magnus Lilja wrote:
> 2009/5/30 Magnus Lilja :
>> 2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
>>> Does the number of address bytes really need to depend on the size of the
>>> flash chip, or can you base it on the number of non-zero bytes in
>>> page_address (the chip will know when the address phase is over because
>>
Hi
2009/5/30 Magnus Lilja :
> 2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
>> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:56:57PM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>>> +static void mx31_nand_page_address(unsigned int page_address)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int page_count;
>>> +
>>> + writew(0x00, NFC_FLASH_ADDR);
>>> + writew(NFC_ADDR
Hi
2009/6/1 Scott Wood :
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> 2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
>> > The bad block location is typically different (offset 0 rather than 5)
>> > with large page flash.
>>
>> I think that's because of the non-standard imlementation of large page
>>
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
> > The bad block location is typically different (offset 0 rather than 5)
> > with large page flash.
>
> I think that's because of the non-standard imlementation of large page
> support in the i.MX31 NFC.
We s
2009/5/29 Scott Wood :
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:56:57PM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> This patch adds the NAND SPL framework needed to boot i.MX31 boards
>> from NAND.
>
> Sorry for the delay...
Well, better now than the next time I post these patches.
>> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx3
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:56:57PM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> This patch adds the NAND SPL framework needed to boot i.MX31 boards
> from NAND.
Sorry for the delay...
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h
> b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h
> index a8a05c8..3d811d7 100644
>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:03:29AM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> As I said in another email:
> "The main purpose of CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL and NAND_SPL in start.S is to
> change the behaviour a bit, not so much to save some space."
> Given that those CONFIG_s are used in other places as well to indicate
2009/5/12 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:03 Mon 11 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> 2009/5/10 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> + }
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> + page_count = CFG_NAND_CHIP_SIZE / CFG_NAND_PAGE_SIZE;
>> >> > please use CONFIG_SYS_ or CONFIG_
>> >>
>>
On 21:03 Mon 11 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
> 2009/5/10 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> >> >> +
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + page_count = CFG_NAND_CHIP_SIZE / CFG_NAND_PAGE_SIZE;
> >> > please use CONFIG_SYS_ or CONFIG_
> >>
> >> Will do.
> >>
> >> > and why not detect it?
> >>
>
2009/5/10 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
>> >> +
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + page_count = CFG_NAND_CHIP_SIZE / CFG_NAND_PAGE_SIZE;
>> > please use CONFIG_SYS_ or CONFIG_
>>
>> Will do.
>>
>> > and why not detect it?
>>
>> Might be possible, I'll look into it to see if it's doable.
> tks
2009/5/10 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:31 Sun 10 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> 2009/5/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
>> > On 21:56 Sun 03 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> >> @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@
>> >> #include
>> >> .globl _start
>> >> _start: b reset
>> >> -#ifdef CONFIG
On 21:31 Sun 10 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
> 2009/5/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> > On 21:56 Sun 03 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
> >> @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@
> >> #include
> >> .globl _start
> >> _start: b reset
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL) ||
2009/5/9 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:56 Sun 03 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@
>> #include
>> .globl _start
>> _start: b reset
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL) || defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
> create a better CONFIG_
> because w
On 21:56 Sun 03 May , Magnus Lilja wrote:
> This patch adds the NAND SPL framework needed to boot i.MX31 boards
> from NAND.
>
> The patch is based on the work by Maxim Artamonov
> (which was signed-off-by him).
so please add it too
and please fix the @
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja
> ---
This patch adds the NAND SPL framework needed to boot i.MX31 boards
from NAND.
The patch is based on the work by Maxim Artamonov
(which was signed-off-by him).
Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja
---
cpu/arm1136/start.S | 29 +++--
include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h | 90 +
16 matches
Mail list logo
