Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Saturday 10 December 2011 19:43:52 Simon Glass wrote:
>> At present two parsers have similar code to execute commands. Also
>> cmd_usage() is called all over the place. This series adds a single
>> function which processes comm
On Saturday 10 December 2011 19:43:52 Simon Glass wrote:
> At present two parsers have similar code to execute commands. Also
> cmd_usage() is called all over the place. This series adds a single
> function which processes commands called cmd_process().
>
> This new function understands return cod
Hi Simon,
On Thursday 12 January 2012 05:37:00 Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > At present two parsers have similar code to execute commands. Also
> > cmd_usage() is called all over the place. This series adds a single
> > function which proce
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> At present two parsers have similar code to execute commands. Also
> cmd_usage() is called all over the place. This series adds a single
> function which processes commands called cmd_process().
>
> This new function understands return co
At present two parsers have similar code to execute commands. Also
cmd_usage() is called all over the place. This series adds a single
function which processes commands called cmd_process().
This new function understands return codes, and in particular
CMD_RET_USAGE to indicate a usage error. So r
5 matches
Mail list logo