Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment isn't linked at address 0

2009-10-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > > Applied to "reloc" branch, thanks. > > Is the intent to merge "reloc" for v2009.11 or post? Yes :-) I will merge it by the end of this week, as previously announced. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment isn't linked at address 0

2009-10-07 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 08 October 2009 04:47:57 Kumar Gala wrote: > >> Changes since v1: > >> - Updated commit title and description > >> - Cleaned up logic to determine if we need to fixup bss address > >> > >> cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds | 11 +++ > >> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment isn't linked at address 0

2009-10-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 7, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Peter Tyser, > > In message <1254933900-16859-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> > you wrote: >> When U-Boot is relocated from flash to RAM pointers are modified >> accordingly. However, pointers initialzed with NULL values should >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment isn't linked at address 0

2009-10-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1254933900-16859-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > When U-Boot is relocated from flash to RAM pointers are modified > accordingly. However, pointers initialzed with NULL values should not > be modified so that they maintain their intended NULL value.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Ensure BSS segment isn't linked at address 0

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Tyser
When U-Boot is relocated from flash to RAM pointers are modified accordingly. However, pointers initialzed with NULL values should not be modified so that they maintain their intended NULL value. If the BSS segment is linked at address 0 its address will not be updated as necessary during relocat