On Oct 7, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Peter Tyser, > > In message <1254933900-16859-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> > you wrote: >> When U-Boot is relocated from flash to RAM pointers are modified >> accordingly. However, pointers initialzed with NULL values should >> not >> be modified so that they maintain their intended NULL value. If the >> BSS segment is linked at address 0 its address will not be >> updated as necessary during relocation. >> >> This is a temporary workaround. The end goal is to add support to >> U-Boot to dynamically locate the BSS at an arbitrary address at >> runtime. When the ability to fixup the BSS inteligently is >> added, this workaround can be removed and the 85xx link script >> can put the BSS at a fixed address at link time. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> >> --- >> Changes since v1: >> - Updated commit title and description >> - Cleaned up logic to determine if we need to fixup bss address >> >> cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Applied to "reloc" branch, thanks.
Is the intent to merge "reloc" for v2009.11 or post? - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
