On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:08:39 +0200
Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
> > Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> [...]
> > so far the 8308 and the 8360 are the only SoCs that don't h
On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
Gerlando Falauto wrote:
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
[...]
so far the 8308 and the 8360 are the only SoCs that don't have a
'tens'/MPC83Xx defines. The 8360 can get away with it, since it's
very cl
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
> > Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> >
> >> - CONFIG_MPC83XX_FEAT_QE
> >
> > this could be CONFIG_QE but should probably be CONFIG_HAS_FSL_QE
> > which doesn
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Gerlando Falauto wrote:
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
So we add a bu
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> This processor, though very similar to other members of the
> PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
> yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
>
> So we add a bunch of new #ifdefs (or complicate the
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
So we add a bunch of new #ifdefs (or complicate the existing ones)
to arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c.
Perhaps it would
6 matches
Mail list logo