On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:08:39 +0200 Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.fala...@keymile.com> wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200 > > Gerlando Falauto<gerlando.fala...@keymile.com> wrote: > > > >> On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > [...] > > so far the 8308 and the 8360 are the only SoCs that don't have a > > 'tens'/MPC83Xx defines. The 8360 can get away with it, since it's > > very close to the 8358 (and we can avoid that marketing-imposed > > snafu). The 8308 and 9 are more different (QE vs TSEC), but as seen > > here, there are other commonalities. > > I personally don't think adding a new 830x symbol would lead to that > much saving. Plus it should be the last one of the series so there won't > be much use in the future either. > So unless you think that's absolutely necessary, I'd submit a v2 without > this. I must be missing something - wouldn't it benefit things like SCCR_USBDRCM for the 8308, which is still being actively developed? Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
