Le 06/08/2010 10:18, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
> Any System = f(board, soc).
> We have board configs header file in place.
> Just having soc-config header file would be enough,
> We should have included within board config file.
> Any unwanted stuff can be undefed below it.
>
> Regards..
> Praf
Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:55 PM
> >> To: Albert ARIBAUD
> >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V7 0/4] Add disk support to
> >> orion5x and edminiv2
> >>
> >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> >>
> >> In message&l
t; Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V7 0/4] Add disk support to
>> orion5x and edminiv2
>>
>> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>>
>> In message<4c5ad4f7.2030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>>>
>>> As for the configs, some u-boot boards
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:55 PM
> To: Albert ARIBAUD
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V7 0/4] Add disk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4c5ad4f7.2030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> As for the configs, some u-boot boards do commonalize, see for instance
> include/configs/spear*.h. That makes sense because there is a board
> family, with a common HW design and common external components.
This is not act
On 2010/08/05 5:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 05/08/2010 16:28, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
>> On 2010/08/05 4:11 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Rogan, what other code do you think you'd be duplicating?
>>>
>>> Amicalement,
>>
>> In truth, I was really thinking only of the config files, not really the
Le 05/08/2010 16:28, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
> On 2010/08/05 4:11 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Rogan, what other code do you think you'd be duplicating?
>>
>> Amicalement,
>
> In truth, I was really thinking only of the config files, not really the
> code per se.
>
> I suppose that there is not reall
On 2010/08/05 4:11 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Rogan, what other code do you think you'd be duplicating?
>
> Amicalement,
In truth, I was really thinking only of the config files, not really the
code per se.
I suppose that there is not really that much else that really is common.
Rogan
Le 05/08/2010 15:02, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Rogan Dawes,
>
> In message<4c5ab1a4.3000...@dawes.za.net> you wrote:
>> This may be a stupid comment, but from my perspective implementing
>> Albert's orion5x changes for my DNS323, all I am doing is copying a lot
>> of what Albert is doing for
Dear Rogan Dawes,
In message <4c5ab1a4.3000...@dawes.za.net> you wrote:
> This may be a stupid comment, but from my perspective implementing
> Albert's orion5x changes for my DNS323, all I am doing is copying a lot
> of what Albert is doing for the edminiv2 verbatim.
>
> Would it not make sense
This may be a stupid comment, but from my perspective implementing
Albert's orion5x changes for my DNS323, all I am doing is copying a lot
of what Albert is doing for the edminiv2 verbatim.
Would it not make sense perhaps to define defaults in a SoC config file,
and then allow them to be overri
Patchset history:
V1: Initial 4-patch set -- not cleanly submitted (does
not appear on gmane for instance) and contained some
unrelated changes.
V2: Slimmed down to 3 patches and removed unrelated
changes.
V3: Back to 4 patches (cmd_ide improvement, driver addition,
cmd_ide suppo
12 matches
Mail list logo
