Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5] ARM: Various: Future-proof serial platdata

2016-03-06 Thread Simon Glass
On 2 March 2016 at 04:38, Adam Ford wrote: > A few boards still use ns16550_platdata structures, but assume the structure > is going to be in a specific order. By explicitly naming each entry, > this should also help 'future-proof' in the event the structure changes. > > Tested on the Logic PD Tor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5] ARM: Various: Future-proof serial platdata

2016-03-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:38:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > A few boards still use ns16550_platdata structures, but assume the structure > is going to be in a specific order. By explicitly naming each entry, > this should also help 'future-proof' in the event the structure changes. > > Tested on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5] ARM: Various: Future-proof serial platdata

2016-03-02 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi Adam, On 02.03.2016 13:38, Adam Ford wrote: > A few boards still use ns16550_platdata structures, but assume the structure > is going to be in a specific order. By explicitly naming each entry, > this should also help 'future-proof' in the event the structure changes. > > Tested on the Logic P

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5] ARM: Various: Future-proof serial platdata

2016-03-02 Thread Alexander Graf
> Am 02.03.2016 um 12:38 schrieb Adam Ford : > > A few boards still use ns16550_platdata structures, but assume the structure > is going to be in a specific order. By explicitly naming each entry, > this should also help 'future-proof' in the event the structure changes. > > Tested on the Logic

[U-Boot] [PATCH V5] ARM: Various: Future-proof serial platdata

2016-03-02 Thread Adam Ford
A few boards still use ns16550_platdata structures, but assume the structure is going to be in a specific order. By explicitly naming each entry, this should also help 'future-proof' in the event the structure changes. Tested on the Logic PD Torpedo + Wireless. I only changed a handful of devices