Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread Eric Nelson
On 10/08/2012 03:18 PM, stefano babic wrote: Am 08/10/2012 23:58, schrieb Troy Kisky: On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: The prompt is not appropri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread Eric Nelson
On 10/08/2012 02:58 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: The prompt is not appropriate if not running on a mx6q processor. Signe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread stefano babic
Am 08/10/2012 23:58, schrieb Troy Kisky: > On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: >>> On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: > The prompt is not appropriate if not running on >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: > I can live with "MX6SABRELITE U-Boot" but I prefer a plain "U-Boot". > The rest seems a waste of screen real estate. The long u-boot commands > are more likely to wrap. Anyone else have an opinion??? Agreed.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread Troy Kisky
On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: The prompt is not appropriate if not running on a mx6q processor. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky But in this case the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-08 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: > On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky >> wrote: >>> The prompt is not appropriate if not running on >>> a mx6q processor. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky >> But in this case the board name will change

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-04 Thread Troy Kisky
On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: The prompt is not appropriate if not running on a mx6q processor. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky But in this case the board name will change, no? No, patch 29/32 sets the new boards to use the same c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: > The prompt is not appropriate if not running on > a mx6q processor. > > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky But in this case the board name will change, no? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br h

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT

2012-10-03 Thread Troy Kisky
The prompt is not appropriate if not running on a mx6q processor. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h b/include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h index 8890e4c..8fd35a6 100644 -