On 09/12/2012 12:00 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Tom,
>
>
>> Rob's series depends on Wolfgang(?)'s u-boot/ext4 branch at present.
>> I'm not sure what the status of that branch is right now - is it
>> something that's ready to be submitted, or is more work there needed,
>> so the bran
On 09/11/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:51:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
This implements the following:
part uuid mmc 0:1
>
Hi Stephen, Tom,
> Rob's series depends on Wolfgang(?)'s u-boot/ext4 branch at present.
> I'm not sure what the status of that branch is right now - is it
> something that's ready to be submitted, or is more work there needed,
> so the branch won't be pulled into u-boot/master in the near future?
On 09/05/2012 05:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:51:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren
>>>
>>> This implements the following:
>>>
>>> part uuid mmc 0:1
>>> -> print partition UUID
>>> part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
On 09/05/2012 05:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:51:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren
>>>
>>> This implements the following:
>>>
>>> part uuid mmc 0:1
>>> -> print partition UUID
>>> part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
On 09/06/2012 11:46 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 11:12 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:38:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> This i
On 09/06/2012 11:12 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:38:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren
This implements the following:
part uuid mmc 0:1
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:38:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren
> >>
> >> This implements the following:
> >>
> >> part uuid mmc 0:1
> >> -> print partition UUID
> >> part uui
On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren
>>
>> This implements the following:
>>
>> part uuid mmc 0:1
>> -> print partition UUID
>> part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
>> -> set environment variable to partition UUID
>
> What's the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:51:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > From: Stephen Warren
> >
> > This implements the following:
> >
> > part uuid mmc 0:1
> > -> print partition UUID
> > part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
> > -> set environment variable to par
On 09/05/2012 05:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> This implements the following:
>
> part uuid mmc 0:1
> -> print partition UUID
> part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
> -> set environment variable to partition UUID
What's the reason to not always both print out and set the uuid en
From: Stephen Warren
This implements the following:
part uuid mmc 0:1
-> print partition UUID
part uuid mmc 0:1 uuid
-> set environment variable to partition UUID
This can be useful when writing a bootcmd which searches all known
devices for something bootable, and then wants the kernel to
12 matches
Mail list logo