On 25/09/2012 00:23, Troy Kisky wrote:
> The advantages of a plugin over spl are
> 1. smaller code 0x190 bytes, plus the table.
> relying on the ROM to do the heavy lifting.
This is true. However, as you are writing in the next line, the bootROM
boots from devices having much more space as some by
On 24/09/2012 22:46, Troy Kisky wrote:
> On 9/23/2012 3:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
>>> The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
>>> file as an argument.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
>>> ---
Hi Troy,
>>
>> I agree with Vikram that a better expl
On 9/23/2012 10:08 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 23/09/2012 18:23, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 09/23/2012 03:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
Hi Troy,
I agree with Vikr
On 9/23/2012 3:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
Hi Troy,
I agree with Vikram that a better explanation of what a plugin is can
help to understand without reading
On 24/09/2012 15:48, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Eric,
>> But I do not get the connection with the imximage and the need for the
>> plugin. If the SOC boots with "Serial Downloader", it polls the USB OTG
>> waiting for command as specified in the protocol. With your tool you set
>> the
Hi Stefano,
On 09/24/2012 12:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 24/09/2012 01:29, Eric Nelson wrote:
This is the part that gets interesting.
You're right that SPL **can** do the job, but only if it supports
the boot media. For the most part, it's reasonable to expect the
code to be written in U-B
On 24/09/2012 01:29, Eric Nelson wrote:
>
> This is the part that gets interesting.
>
> You're right that SPL **can** do the job, but only if it supports
> the boot media. For the most part, it's reasonable to expect the
> code to be written in U-Boot for that, since the boot media may
> also be
On 09/23/2012 10:08 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 23/09/2012 18:23, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 09/23/2012 03:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
Hi Troy,
I agree with Vi
On 23/09/2012 18:23, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 03:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
>>> The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
>>> file as an argument.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
>>> ---
>>
>> Hi Troy,
>>
>> I agree with Vikram that a bette
On 09/23/2012 03:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
Hi Troy,
I agree with Vikram that a better explanation of what a plugin is can
help to understand without readi
On 22/09/2012 04:39, Troy Kisky wrote:
> The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
> file as an argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
> ---
Hi Troy,
I agree with Vikram that a better explanation of what a plugin is can
help to understand without reading deeply into the i.MX6 manual.
So a
On 9/22/2012 8:09 AM, Troy Kisky wrote:
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
An explanation of what is "plugin" and what the file plugin.S does
should be better. Not in the subject of the patch, you can place it as a
README.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
ar
The "plugin" command of mkimage can take this
file as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile |5 +-
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/plugin.S | 164 ++
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h |1 +
3 files changed,
13 matches
Mail list logo
