Dear Stefano Babic,
In message <4b540ab9.5080...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > What happens if - for example - CONFIG_SYS_MX51_UART1 _and_
> > CONFIG_SYS_MX51_UART2 are defiend? How is CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI going to
> > be supported?
>
> The patch adds only support for the i.MX51 and does
Something mi
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stefano Babic,
>
Hi Wolfgang,
>> @@ -49,8 +51,14 @@
>> #define UART_PHYS 0x1001b000
>> #elif defined(CONFIG_SYS_MX27_UART6)
>> #define UART_PHYS 0x1001c000
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SYS_MX51_UART1)
>> +#define UART_PHYS UART1_BASE_ADDR
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SYS_M
Dear Stefano Babic,
In message <1263212760-27272-6-git-send-email-sba...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The patch adds support for the Freescale mx51 processor.
> @@ -49,8 +51,14 @@
> #define UART_PHYS 0x1001b000
> #elif defined(CONFIG_SYS_MX27_UART6)
> #define UART_PHYS 0x1001c000
> +#elif defined(CON
The patch adds support for the Freescale mx51 processor.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Fred Fan fanyef...@gmail.com
---
drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c b/drivers/serial/seri
4 matches
Mail list logo