Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Would it suffice to change the patch description for this patch to be
> accepted, or do you still want this patch to be dropped / changes? We
> could use fdcur, fdtrg, devcur, devtrg, erasecur, erasetrg to save the
> typ
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > It's not purely stylistic. For example, previously the code had fd and
> > fdr, curdev and otherdev. It used one erase struct for both main and
> > redundant copies, th
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> It's not purely stylistic. For example, previously the code had fd and
> fdr, curdev and otherdev. It used one erase struct for both main and
> redundant copies, thus they had to initialise it multiple times to one or
>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Use consistent naming for active and redundant environment variables, remove
> > redundant erase struct initialisation by using separate structs for the
> > active and redunda
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Use consistent naming for active and redundant environment variables, remove
> redundant erase struct initialisation by using separate structs for the
> active and redundant environments.
This is another sylistic change that
Use consistent naming for active and redundant environment variables, remove
redundant erase struct initialisation by using separate structs for the
active and redundant environments.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
tools/env/fw_env.c | 129 +-
6 matches
Mail list logo
