Dear Scott Wood,
In message <20100817131904.5703f...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> ...but "take this entire subsystem as is" or "go without anything
> vaguely resembling this code, lest it be called 'duplication'" is a
> rather limiting pair of choices. It seems reasonable to refa
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:20:00 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1282024011.2814.61.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> > For this case, I need to call some functions like getenv, hwconfig,
> > printf, strcmp etc. which are needed in ddr spd code, but I don't want
>
> I think this is
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message <1282024011.2814.61.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
> > > Makefile | 18 ++-
> > > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_nand.c | 31 +++-
> > > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/sram_boot/Makefile| 190
>
On Mon, 2010-16-08 at 12:23 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Haiying Wang,
>
> In message <1281945897.24612.17.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> > Once CONFIG_MIDDLE_STAGE_SRAM_BOOT is defined, CONFIG_SRAM_BOOT is enabled
> > to
> > generate u-boot-sram.bin which will run in the l2/l3 s
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
> > ---
> > Makefile | 18 ++-
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_nand.c | 31 +++-
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/sram_boot/Makefile| 1
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message <1281945897.24612.17.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> Once CONFIG_MIDDLE_STAGE_SRAM_BOOT is defined, CONFIG_SRAM_BOOT is enabled to
> generate u-boot-sram.bin which will run in the l2/l3 sram. This middle stage
> uboot will init ddr sdram with ddr spd code an
Once CONFIG_MIDDLE_STAGE_SRAM_BOOT is defined, CONFIG_SRAM_BOOT is enabled to
generate u-boot-sram.bin which will run in the l2/l3 sram. This middle stage
uboot will init ddr sdram with ddr spd code and load the final uboot image to
ddr and start from there. It is useful for the silicons which have
7 matches
Mail list logo
