Dear Scott Wood, In message <20100817131904.5703f...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > ...but "take this entire subsystem as is" or "go without anything > vaguely resembling this code, lest it be called 'duplication'" is a > rather limiting pair of choices. It seems reasonable to refactor > things to be more modular (possibly in a nicer way than sprinkling > ifdefs), or provide an alternate trimmed-down implementation.
Agreed. Factoring out functions that can then be selected on Makefile level is probably OK. > One thing that should probably be tried first, though, is > -ffunction-sections and --gc-sections, to have the linker discard any > functions that aren't referenced. It seems some arches/boards already > use this. I guess that should help here a lot, too. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de A day without sunshine is like night. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
