On 03/12/2012 12:25, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Monday, December 3, 2012 10:03:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> I am thinking about if we need some kind of protection to avoid to
>> destroy very easy the SOC. Running a fuse command can be much more
>> dangerous as scrubbing NAND o
Hi Stefano,
On Monday, December 3, 2012 10:03:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> I am thinking about if we need some kind of protection to avoid to
> destroy very easy the SOC. Running a fuse command can be much more
> dangerous as scrubbing NAND or erasing flash.
>
> What about to add at least a "-y"
On 14/08/2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> ---
Hi Benoît,
I agree with you that same code can be used then for i.MX6. There is no
need of a para
On 11/27/2012 12:23 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:36:41 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
Hi Benoît,
On 11/27/2012 11:27 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Eric, Dirk,
and some per-arch documentation about how to translate
between the reference manual and the comma
Hi Eric,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:36:41 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On 11/27/2012 11:27 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Eric, Dirk,
> >
> >> and some per-arch documentation about how to translate
> >> between the reference manual and the command.
> >
> > Yes. Should this do
Hi Benoît,
On 11/27/2012 11:27 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Eric, Dirk,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:58:19 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
I don't have strong feelings one way or the other. If left to
me, I'd probably stick with the imxotp command, but Benoît has
clearly walked through the detail
Hi Eric, Dirk,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:58:19 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> I don't have strong feelings one way or the other. If left to
> me, I'd probably stick with the imxotp command, but Benoît has
> clearly walked through the details and we're not talking about
> a lot of code either way.
On 11/27/2012 12:19 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 26.11.2012 17:03, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Eric, all,
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:23:20 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
On 26.11.2012 17:03, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Eric, all,
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:23:20 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
This can be useful for fuse-like hardware,
Hi Eric, all,
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:23:20 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
> >> On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> >>> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
> >>
> >> Fo
On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's U-Boot to
our mainline U-Boot in the
On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
>
> For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's U-Boot to
> our mainline U-Boot in the queue [1].
>
> As I don't have the ove
On 22.08.2012 13:11, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:43:05 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's U-Bo
Hi Dirk,
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:25:57 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 22.08.2012 13:11, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Dirk,
> >
> > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:43:05 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> >> On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> >>> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware,
Hi Dirk,
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:43:05 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
>
> For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's U-Boot
> to
> our mainline U-Boot in the queu
On 14.08.2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's U-Boot to
our mainline U-Boot in the queue [1].
As I don't have the overview over the various i.MXxx SoCs and don't
und
Hi Stefano,
> > This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> > Cc: Stefano Babic
> > ---
>
> CC to Anatolji, he knows very well the MPC5121 that has currently
> support of fuses.
>
> > {u-boot-4d3c95f.orig
On 14/08/2012 14:52, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> ---
CC to Anatolji, he knows very well the MPC5121 that has currently
support of fuses.
> {u-boot-4d
This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
{u-boot-4d3c95f.orig => u-boot-4d3c95f}/README |1 +
.../common/Makefile|1 +
/dev/null => u-boot-4d3c95f/common
19 matches
Mail list logo
