On Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:02:17 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 04:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 01:31:28 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> Is it really such a burden to put something like
> >>>
> >>> #def
On 10/05/2011 04:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 01:31:28 AM Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Is it really such a burden to put something like
>>>
>>> #define CONFIG_SPL_ARCH_CPU
>>>
>>> in your board config header?
>>
>> Yes it
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 01:31:28 AM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/20/2011 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:23:01 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>> On Tuesday, S
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 01:31:28 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:23:01 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 09:12:08 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 0
On 09/20/2011 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:23:01 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 09:12:08 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2011 05:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Then you adjust the makefile
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:23:01 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 09:12:08 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2011 05:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Then you adjust the makefile there by ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> >>
> >> It
On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 09:12:08 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/19/2011 05:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Then you adjust the makefile there by ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>
>> It's not quite that simple, since different SPLs will have different
>> requ
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 09:12:08 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 05:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 19, 2011 08:13:45 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/16/2011 05:48 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> The stuff in arch/arm/cpu should be exactly what you need, nothing more
> >
On 09/19/2011 05:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 08:13:45 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 05:48 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> The stuff in arch/arm/cpu should be exactly what you need, nothing more !
>>
>> This is "spl/", not "arch/arm/spl/", so let's not reason from on
On Monday, September 19, 2011 08:13:45 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 05:48 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:07:52 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> You have no idea why I'd like to be extremely selective with what I
> >> include in a 4K binary?
> >
> > That I do underst
On 09/16/2011 05:48 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:07:52 AM Scott Wood wrote:
>> You have no idea why I'd like to be extremely selective with what I
>> include in a 4K binary?
>
> That I do understand -- but that kind of selection is there.
>>
>> It's not about avoidin
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:07:52 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> Still,
On 09/16/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
tha
On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
> >> that you include, not directories?
> >
> > I don
On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files
>> that you include, not directories?
>
> I don't think so ... why ?
That's how the main U-Boot build does it... More
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/15/2011 06:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:57:44 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
> >>> su
On 09/15/2011 06:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:57:44 AM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
>>> support library. This can be useful on some setups.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-b
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:57:44 AM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
> > support library. This can be useful on some setups.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> > Cc: Stefano Babic
> > Cc
On 09/11/2011 11:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU support
> library. This can be useful on some setups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Detlev Zundel
> Cc: Chander Kashyap
But you didn
Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU support
library. This can be useful on some setups.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Stefano Babic
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Detlev Zundel
Cc: Chander Kashyap
---
spl/Makefile |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 de
20 matches
Mail list logo