On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:42:50 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/16/2011 04:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:49:28 PM Scott Wood wrote: > >> Still, this seems hackish. Shouldn't the control be on specific files > >> that you include, not directories? > > > > I don't think so ... why ? > > That's how the main U-Boot build does it... More specifically, the > config.h controls should be on features, and the makefiles should decide > which (if any) files are required for that feature. If there are no > files from arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU) needed, then we get an empty > lib$(CPU).o -- nothing special needed to avoid it.
Yes, but you basically _always_ want that CPU support code in ... and I have no idea why you'd like to avoid particular files. > > -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
