On Tuesday 21 March 2017 12:22 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:37:36AM +, André Przywara wrote:
On 03/03/17 14:32, Maxime Ripard wrote:
If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not
have NAND support enabled (with the associated options
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:37:36AM +, André Przywara wrote:
> On 03/03/17 14:32, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not
> > have NAND support enabled (with the associated options) will not compile
> > anymore.
> >
> > Depend on
On 03/03/17 14:32, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not
> have NAND support enabled (with the associated options) will not compile
> anymore.
>
> Depend on the NAND driver configuration option to make sure that is not the
> case.
> Re
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not
> have NAND support enabled (with the associated options) will not compile
> anymore.
>
> Depend on the NAND driver configuration option to make sure that is not the
If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not
have NAND support enabled (with the associated options) will not compile
anymore.
Depend on the NAND driver configuration option to make sure that is not the
case.
Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
5 matches
Mail list logo